Official Soldat Forums

Soldat Talk => Game Improvements / Suggestions => Topic started by: PaFel on December 24, 2007, 09:08:19 am

Title: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: PaFel on December 24, 2007, 09:08:19 am
How about adding the graphic that would appear behind the LAW when shootin'? It would look more realistic 'cause all of gazes that are maden when the grenade shoots goes to the back. It would be also good to make the smoke not dissapearin momentaly but stays few seconds. It would be also good to add the same gfx but deafulty transparent to all weapons 'cause of moding possibilities.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Thinkto urself on December 24, 2007, 01:37:44 pm
That might get in the way of some other mods, but if there's an option to turn it on and off, F12!!!
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: a-4-year-old on December 24, 2007, 04:12:22 pm
That might get in the way of some other mods, but if there's an option to turn it on and off, F12!!!
old mod + blank image = fixt
Old mod + copy default = fixt
Old mod + update = fixt

Your problem is?
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Pie on December 24, 2007, 04:24:24 pm
That might get in the way of some other mods, but if there's an option to turn it on and off, F12!!!
Why would you want to turn off a GFX? That's stupid.

hmmm, i don't like the look of that Ak i might turn it's gfx off.
If it's implemented it's implemented if it isn't then we miss the pretty smoke :D
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Magic Odd Effect on December 24, 2007, 05:16:36 pm
F12
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Will on December 24, 2007, 05:54:47 pm
Well if it gets implemented, it should use a completely different graphic so we could leave blank files if we don't want our mod to use the back fire
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: TiReD on December 24, 2007, 06:06:58 pm
If they implement this they would have to change the law smoke, since its used for jets too. (I remember that being a suggestion too.)
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Magic Odd Effect on December 25, 2007, 09:57:22 pm
If they implement this they would have to change the law smoke, since its used for jets too. (I remember that being a suggestion too.)
The smoke is only used for trailing behind the missile, and they're talking about a completely different gfx file that makes up the backblast of the LAW.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Horve on December 25, 2007, 10:49:48 pm
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Pie on December 26, 2007, 12:23:58 am
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...
hmm, well it's better then some suggestions.
 :O O WANTS VEhICLESZORZ!!!! AND I WANTS MA KNIFE TO Shoot LAZORSZ BEAMS!!! AND INSTA KILL J00.

This is actually a good suggestion. Everyone likes soldat being pretty.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Psycho on December 26, 2007, 01:47:14 am
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...

Your post is the only waste of "bites" around here.

The idea sounds pretty neat. Small and simple, those are the kind that MM should have time to implement. Would give a nice effect to fiering the LAW :D

F12
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: PaFel on December 26, 2007, 05:12:05 am
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...

But unlike other nice ideas this one would take short time to add and it would make Soldat looks better.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: FearTheReaper on December 26, 2007, 11:11:57 pm
It would also add the effect of even better pinpointing LAW campers.

Not that it was hard anyway, but F12.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Lord Frunkamunch on December 27, 2007, 08:19:40 pm
F12age.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Snake on December 27, 2007, 08:23:37 pm
Ya F12 me like
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Vilho on December 28, 2007, 10:20:19 pm
...yet more eye delicacies, but why not.

F12.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Ziem on December 29, 2007, 10:27:52 am
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Centurion on December 29, 2007, 11:35:51 am
F12. I kinde like that.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: ghg on December 31, 2007, 07:41:26 am
F12 cuz it soundz prettiful.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Magic Odd Effect on January 01, 2008, 05:08:19 pm
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Like the real AT-4.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Centurion on January 01, 2008, 05:16:48 pm
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Like the real AT-4.


Not damage. It will kill you! In real life, backblast kills you.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Eclipse on January 01, 2008, 05:16:53 pm
F12. Like some RPGs too.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Fluffy on January 02, 2008, 02:24:49 am
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Like the real AT-4.


Not damage. It will kill you! In real life, backblast kills you.

Perhaps we should make the Minigun's recoil more realistic? Did you also know that a knife throw to the feet is never an instakill in real life? Also the belt of Minimi is quite short... it should be 200 rounds.

Blah blah. Meh.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Splinter-Snake on January 02, 2008, 02:36:23 am
Perhaps we should make the Minigun's recoil more realistic? Did you also know that a knife throw to the feet is never an instakill in real life? Also the belt of Minimi is quite short... it should be 200 rounds.

Blah blah. Meh.

Doesn't this argument against realism ever get old?
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: JaKe on January 02, 2008, 06:34:41 am
i quote for law backfire!
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: Lord Frunkamunch on January 02, 2008, 08:55:38 am
Doesn't this argument against realism ever get old?

At least he didn't mention jet boots.
Title: Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
Post by: crazydude360 on January 04, 2008, 04:03:22 pm
yea that back blast would be good for
1. spotting law sprayers
2. getting lucky and toarching that guy that was sneaking up behind u
3. would just look freaking cool!