Official Soldat Forums
Soldat Talk => Game Improvements / Suggestions => Topic started by: wolfbr on March 08, 2009, 02:24:52 am
-
For example, you can grab Enemys and use them as a human shield which really helps to prolong your life…
who to use?
press "f" close to the enemy for it uses it as shield
press "f" an throw the enemy(in others, in grenades,pits..)
you need Fists to use it:(to another weapon it is optional):
ex:
primary weapon = mp5
secundary weapon = fists
---
advantages, disadvantages
-more defese
-slow movement
-more bink
-1 hit cancel the shield.
-you cannot jump,crouch or go prone.
-
Erm...No?
Slows down gameplay, VERY annoying to be held by someone, and finally, NO.
-
Erm...No?
Slows down gameplay, VERY annoying to be held by someone, and finally, NO.
What he said.
Plus... chainsaw?
-
F11, iDante spkoe it out ;D
-
^ What everyone above me (other than topic starter) has said.
-
none of your team will care if you die
so when you are grabbed
they will kill you to kill the enemy :(
-
Negative...F11
-
Doesn't fit in soldat imho
-
dam, that would be
really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, REALLY messy
f11
and i dont thing 50 EnEsCes would be enough to modify that
-
hah nice idea but
Doesn't fit in soldat
-
Isn't worth the effort.
I mean the effort of getting close enough to the enemy only to grab him and live a few seconds longer (and get M79'd in the face as soon as your shield gets useless)
And the effort of coding this whole thing. Soldat is too fast paced for those kinds of tricks.
-
Erm...No?
Slows down gameplay, VERY annoying to be held by someone, and finally, NO.
What he said.
Plus... chainsaw?
What they said, plus it's just stupid. F11'ed
-
All that is needed to be said is NO.
-
Using enemies as human shields is not only a fun extra, it would be useful to cover an ally(CFT,INF)and obtain an extra defense.
in friendly fire off, human shield functions similar to the Bullet Vest.
in friendly fire on, Human shield of the one good protection.
therefore , is not very useful against some weapons(Barret,m2..)
it does not need the shield more than? press "s" to kill using your weapon or press "X" to kill using your hands
in this way, punch would be a useful weapon. ;D
-
I'd say no, because it would actually ruin the sportsmanship ingame because of whining and complaining, and I can think of a few things some people would say.
F11
-
I think that projectiles should still collide with dead people, I remember killing someone in front of me and then using their dead body as a meat shield from grenades, or vice versa throwing grenades at the dead body so any nades close by would blow up. It saddened me when MM took that out. For the idea you have, f11. But the idea of meat shields in-game is a great tactic.
-
it does not need the shield more than? press "s" to kill using your weapon or press "X" to kill using your hands
"Okay, I've had my fun with this shield, time to kill him off and continue using my M79."
*Presses S*
*Explodes*
-
it does not need the shield more than? press "s" to kill using your weapon or press "X" to kill using your hands
"Okay, I've had my fun with this shield, time to kill him off and continue using my M79."
*Presses S*
*Explodes*
you can always kill enemy players with the butt of your weapon using the 'S' key(m79,law)
-
Umm, it'd tick me off to be heaved around taking bullets.
-
Arent bodies penetratable ?
Bodies dissapear after respawn.
Imagine spawn camper with fresh bodies all around the place.
Verdict - NO
-
Definitely not a fan.
-
you could only use "still alive enemy",not dead body,
Because it would be very easy to obtain a shield.
they remember that it is not very easy to arrive close to the enemies.
-
it is not very easy to arrive close to the enemies.
Which is exactly why i think this feature shouldnt be added. :S
How often can you punch the enemy to death? Very rarely. Same thing with human shield. It's not worth adding simply because it's too hard to execute and it won't be used most of the time.
You have better chance of surviving by killing enemies from the distance, or at least with a chainsaw, than trying to get a human shield.
-
What people above me said :/
1-Would be hard to kill...Sort of
2-People could use it for |Spawn Killing|
3-Not fun for people around you
-
What people above me said :/
1-Would be hard to kill...Sort of
2-People could use it for |Spawn Killing|
3-Not fun for people around you
1- not,It is similar to bullet vest, it is an additional defense, not a super shield from Cs-1.6
2- the shield protects its front, to the other parts is vulnerable .
3- it is funny for me :D
-
I said "Fun" not funny but thats what I think I dont know your thinking about this so yeah :D
-
I say no, as this would be a highly useless, rarely usable feature. I'd say development time should be spent on better things than this.
-
Heh, good point, makes me think of spawncamping Ash..
-
I say no, as this would be a highly useless, rarely usable feature. I'd say development time should be spent on better things than this.
not much rare,the times we see players killing with the ChainSaw, knife, spars-12.
it is not easy if to approach to the enemies, but also it is not very difficult, this only demands practical.
with this improvement, punch would be a good one sets the short distance.
-
yes! I love MGS! lol... but this is soldat... good idea... but no... there would surely be some abuse
-
I say no, as this would be a highly useless, rarely usable feature. I'd say development time should be spent on better things than this.
not much rare,the times we see players killing with the ChainSaw, knife, spars-12.
it is not easy if to approach to the enemies, but also it is not very difficult, this only demands practical.
with this improvement, punch would be a good one sets the short distance.
Chainsaw fires faster than fists do, therefore it's easier to try and hit someone with, and at least guarantees a kill. The fists, if you ever manage to get a kill, leave you defenceless. The only time you actually fist someone (usually) is when you're standing in the same spot as them and can only use the butt of your gun to hit them.
Knife and Spas-12 are terrible examples. You throw the knife at people. And the Spas is a fucking gun, has nothing to do with melee attacks.
Still say no.
-
He just doesn't give up. ;D
-
Erm...No?
Slows down gameplay, VERY annoying to be held by someone, and finally, NO.
What he said.
Plus... chainsaw?
.
^^^
All the games you have mentioned are singleplayer games! Anything that restricts a players movement in a multiplayer game is generally a bad thing.
-
What about throwing a dead body at an enemy? Lolz worth the ask.
-
Even though it would be greatly annoying to be held, it could work. I remember another game that allowed you to pick up and throw players...LF2...
-
Even though it would be greatly annoying to be held, it could work. I remember another game that allowed you to pick up and throw players...LF2...
but was it a multiplayer game? it wont work
-
No, too much slowing down to the pace, and simply, stupid. no.
-
if you want this feature in a game then go and play the games that you have mentioned in the title.
-
but was it a multiplayer game?
Yes, yes it is.
-
I say no, as this would be a highly useless, rarely usable feature. I'd say development time should be spent on better things than this.
not much rare,the times we see players killing with the ChainSaw, knife, spars-12.
it is not easy if to approach to the enemies, but also it is not very difficult, this only demands practical.
with this improvement, punch would be a good one sets the short distance.
Knife? my friend what did you say? people can get knife kills from 80+ meters (a friend of mine got 93) and i get 50's and 60's myself.
-
Why would you want to be able to throw bodies at other players? Almost half the time your in midair with jets on, fighting for your life.