Mixing Realistic and normal mode

[a-4-year-old]

making more options for realistic does not improve the game, it makes for annoyances for every different server out there and then switching your strategies tactics and how you move and how you shoot for every server. it would be like every server had this outragious wm where everything changed and you would have to adjust  to it somehow.


its just such a horrible idea

[H31MU7]

After reading echo's post , The my view on this has changed. It would become too confusing.

[Zegovia]

Sweet as moonshine!!

[Aquamenti]

It's like

Yes[20]
No[4]

So this should be done.

[a-4-year-old]

It's like

Yes[20]
No[4]

So this should be done.

so what? majority wins? Bush had most votes but nobody wants him now

and one guy changed his mind, making him the only person who listens to reason.

Do you realise that there are hundreds of possiblilties? 2modes and four realistic options then normal mode. fortyeight different possibilities from my count, then 7 game modes where any of the forty eight combinations could take effect. that is 336 combinations of modes, each you would have to adjust your style to fit.

most of the time there arent even that many (dedicated public) servers for all these combinations.

BE SMART! VOTE NO FOR STUPID IDEA

[nidpants]

This is a suggestions/ideas forum, it's not the WIKI for official, real, actual Soldat gameplay. This is where raw ideas are suggested and hopefully refined. If MM happens upon this topic, wants to include the feature, and finds a reasonable way to make it work, fantastic. A majority of the people who voted in this topic would be, at least initially, happy, and some wouldn't.

a-4-year-old, I'm sure you realize that any server has the capability of completely removing any weapon, modifying availability of any power-up, and tweaking any weapon in any way imaginable, not to mention the adaptability one has to have in playing different maps or game types. I would say that there are already more than 336 different ways to play, and you already have to adjust according to server rules.

I would appreciate it if you didn't troll my topics that people are responding positively to by calling the idea, and anyone who supported it "stupid".

[fishfood]

I feel it is fine as it is.

[Meep.]

It's like

Yes[20]
No[4]

So this should be done.

Thing is, the lot of 'em probably arent rsers and the people saying no are (most of em). 

[X-Rayz]

It's like

Yes[20]
No[4]

So this should be done.

Thing is, the lot of 'em probably arent rsers and the people saying no are (most of em). 

But all the n00bzorzlol are saying yes and all the cool d00ds are saying no.

And look at 4 year olds post. I'm probably too dumb to know if thats right but it looks pretty freaky to me.

[The_Teacher]

Yes, limited vision only would be pretty neat^^