Author Topic: Saddam's dead  (Read 7613 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Red Guy

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 751
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #40 on: December 31, 2006, 12:01:36 am »
"President George W. Bush said Saddam Hussein received a fair trial and his death is an ``important milestone'' for moving Iraq toward a democracy."
:o

Offline Wolf_Man

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 348
  • I'm everything you're not watching.
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #41 on: December 31, 2006, 12:03:03 am »
Bush is a tardish son of a beep
he has eyebrows of authority + 5. Are you kidding?

Offline Spyder

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 245
  • Member Since 19 Oct 2002
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #42 on: December 31, 2006, 12:10:40 am »
He shouldn't be hunged. That's just not right.


Offline Captain Ben

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • "forum's-rebellious-cool-guy"
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #44 on: December 31, 2006, 03:11:22 am »
Thought he was gonna be executed by a firing squad... oh well.. I bet they will find someone else to pick on sooner or later...

Maybe it'll be Osama bin Laden...anybody remember him? He flew some planes into some towers...that somehow got us in Iraq...

;]

wtf are you on about? Iraq and Osama are completely different things.

Hanging Saddam was cruel... he was only hanging out for a good time.

Wow, way to fly off the handle like one of those violent retards. I was saying that we spent all this time, all these thousands of troops looking for this irrelevant threat and we hang him. We send a few thousand men to Afghanistan and can't find a guy in a cave. A guy who is a relevant threat. Or was, rather. I was only saying we should concentrate on finding and hanging him. I don't know what your ****ing problem is.

Since I'm soooooooo flying off the handle, tell me please, where you said anything particularly to do with the challenge of finding Bin Laden in a cave in the post from you that I quoted.
Or where were you "only saying" that your country should concentrate on finding and hanging him? From what you typed (and what I quoted), it looks as if you think that because of 911, American soldiers are invading Iraq.

So how about, if you have something to say, you actually say it, fuckface. I'd also like to know how I was being like a violent retard but you probably had a reason and couldn't be arsed to type it. faggot.

Offline Mr. Domino

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 969
  • Don't just sit there and waste your precious time.
    • XBLIG.co
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #45 on: December 31, 2006, 09:09:47 am »
Edit: Yes Saddam made many ppl die, but haven´t Bush done that to? Maybe not Bush orders but still many civilian suffers after the invasion of iraq.

That's an apples and oranges comparison. It's far different than direct ordered slaughter of people, but, yes, many in the U.S. do (finally) appear to disapprove of Bush's invasion of Iraq, using false information to launch the attack, an effort which now claims more U.S. casualties than the World Trade Center events which began the whole episode. That said, in Bush's mind, he is protecting the nation and world from the greater threat of Islamic extremists, and any deaths resulting from "winning" this invasion are for the greater good and eventual safety of all involved.

Yes, it's stupid. Don't try to apply logic to the U.S. government. :P It's pretty scary the damage an idiot with a gun can wreak.

Offline swebonny

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 279
  • BUahh...
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #46 on: December 31, 2006, 02:31:15 pm »

Offline XYZ

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 104
  • Banned
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #47 on: December 31, 2006, 02:43:49 pm »
It's funny when people pretend to know about politics.

Offline Rambo_6

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 463
  • Banned
    • (Adam Whitby) What where you're freinds doing on my server earlier?!
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #48 on: December 31, 2006, 02:55:40 pm »
Does anyone here get the feeling that they only sent Saddam back to Iraq so they'd hang him (as apposed to him being injected in america)?

Offline xtishereb

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
  • I swear, my chainsaw killed you on its own.
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #49 on: December 31, 2006, 10:16:23 pm »
No, we sent him back because he didn't break any laws in America. Only UN laws in Iraq.
In America, he'd probably have been killed somehow before can he could be captured.
<3*xwd
love conquers all

Offline Captain Ben

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • &quot;forum's-rebellious-cool-guy&quot;
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #50 on: January 01, 2007, 01:18:47 am »
He was sent back so he could be trialled in his own country by his own people.

Offline Chariot

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 604
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #51 on: January 01, 2007, 11:45:14 am »
...and by his own puppet government.
Thought he was gonna be executed by a firing squad... oh well.. I bet they will find someone else to pick on sooner or later...

Maybe it'll be Osama bin Laden...anybody remember him? He flew some planes into some towers...that somehow got us in Iraq...

;]

wtf are you on about? Iraq and Osama are completely different things.

Hanging Saddam was cruel... he was only hanging out for a good time.

Wow, way to fly off the handle like one of those violent retards. I was saying that we spent all this time, all these thousands of troops looking for this irrelevant threat and we hang him. We send a few thousand men to Afghanistan and can't find a guy in a cave. A guy who is a relevant threat. Or was, rather. I was only saying we should concentrate on finding and hanging him. I don't know what your ****ing problem is.

Since I'm soooooooo flying off the handle, tell me please, where you said anything particularly to do with the challenge of finding Bin Laden in a cave in the post from you that I quoted.
Or where were you "only saying" that your country should concentrate on finding and hanging him? From what you typed (and what I quoted), it looks as if you think that because of 911, American soldiers are invading Iraq.

So how about, if you have something to say, you actually say it, ****face. I'd also like to know how I was being like a violent retard but you probably had a reason and couldn't be arsed to type it. ***got.

Calm down.  I made no personal attack at you and there you go all insane and what not...

Zegovia said we'll find someone else to pick on sooner or later and I thought Hey! Why not the guy that landed us in this war to begin with?  So I say, let's go after Bin Laden, which for some reason you take personal offense too, or something.  I was making a point that we should have focused on Bin Laden.

Go ask the guy in the white coat for your medicine.
Vidi Vici Veni
I saw, I conquered, I came

Offline a-4-year-old

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #52 on: January 01, 2007, 12:12:57 pm »
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7532034279766935521

The actual hanging, where you see+hear his neck snap.
I didn't hear any neck snappings, only a lot of people shouting and the video getting really blurry
If we hit the bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. -Zapp Brannigan

Offline Graham

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Southern
    • - uh oh -
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #53 on: January 01, 2007, 12:15:33 pm »
Quote
Calm down.  I made no personal attack at you and there you go all insane and what not...
Quote
Go ask the guy in the white coat for your medicine.
Great way of not using personal attacks...
@ii

Offline Death MachineX350

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 492
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #54 on: January 01, 2007, 04:33:31 pm »
Asta la vista BITCH!

Offline Dascoo

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 200
  • banned from the forums
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #55 on: January 01, 2007, 06:42:38 pm »
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7532034279766935521

The actual hanging, where you see+hear his neck snap.
I didn't hear any neck snappings, only a lot of people shouting and the video getting really blurry

For those who don't want to go through all the yelling......
Saddam's Death

Just in case some people don't want a surprise death scene playing for them - Vij
« Last Edit: January 01, 2007, 07:03:19 pm by VijchtiDoodah »

UnReQuitLo
ɹǝƃuɐɥɔɹǝƃıu

Offline a-4-year-old

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #56 on: January 01, 2007, 06:59:28 pm »
yeah, but i wanted to see a guillitine french revolution style, LET THE STREETS BE FLOODED WITH BLOOD OF THE ENEMY

hold his head up in the air, of course, snipers would have to be placed everywhere if they had had an outside hanging/gullitineing
If we hit the bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. -Zapp Brannigan

Offline Captain Ben

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • &quot;forum's-rebellious-cool-guy&quot;
Re: Saddam's dead
« Reply #57 on: January 02, 2007, 06:25:07 am »
...and by his own puppet government.
Thought he was gonna be executed by a firing squad... oh well.. I bet they will find someone else to pick on sooner or later...

Maybe it'll be Osama bin Laden...anybody remember him? He flew some planes into some towers...that somehow got us in Iraq...

;]

wtf are you on about? Iraq and Osama are completely different things.

Hanging Saddam was cruel... he was only hanging out for a good time.

Wow, way to fly off the handle like one of those violent retards. I was saying that we spent all this time, all these thousands of troops looking for this irrelevant threat and we hang him. We send a few thousand men to Afghanistan and can't find a guy in a cave. A guy who is a relevant threat. Or was, rather. I was only saying we should concentrate on finding and hanging him. I don't know what your ****ing problem is.

Since I'm soooooooo flying off the handle, tell me please, where you said anything particularly to do with the challenge of finding Bin Laden in a cave in the post from you that I quoted.
Or where were you "only saying" that your country should concentrate on finding and hanging him? From what you typed (and what I quoted), it looks as if you think that because of 911, American soldiers are invading Iraq.

So how about, if you have something to say, you actually say it, ****face. I'd also like to know how I was being like a violent retard but you probably had a reason and couldn't be arsed to type it. ***got.

Calm down. I made no personal attack at you and there you go all insane and what not...

Zegovia said we'll find someone else to pick on sooner or later and I thought Hey! Why not the guy that landed us in this war to begin with? So I say, let's go after Bin Laden, which for some reason you take personal offense too, or something. I was making a point that we should have focused on Bin Laden.

Go ask the guy in the white coat for your medicine.

I'll ignore all your little borish crap and get straight to the point:
THE WAR IN IRAQ IS NOT BECAUSE OF OSAMA.
Osama is not the reason that soldiers are in Iraq, they're in Iraq to topple Saddam's regime, neutralize the threat that is him and his followers, find WMDs and stop him killing his own people. The War on Terror is so **** up Bin Laden and his little crew of terrorists so that Americans and other nations can feel safe without having their bars, large buildings and public transport going up in flames around them.

You did NOT make any points, I only reacted to when you said that Osama is the reason Iraq was invaded (which is completely wrong).

Wanker.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2007, 06:26:55 am by Captain Ben »