Ok, Battlefield 2 is officially CRAP!

[Valorman]

Model of my card is a GEForce 7600 I think. its an Nvidia and it set me back about 200 bucks (I have a small PC case, which in turn leaves me with a small motherboard....so I had to get a PCI card)
Let me get back to you on that one.

Anyway....does anyone have any recommendations for good Modern war (no Si-Fi crap) OFFLINE games?

I'm pretty sure there's no 7600 PCI card (I'm not 100% sure). Also, PCI is your problem.

GRAW 2's multiplayer rocks! It actually feels like you're the soldier unlike BF2 where it's stiff.

Red Orchestra does it better

Rainbow Six Does it even better, not to mention the insanely awesome realism in the game.

So you're telling me Rainbow six does realism better when it has regeneratable health, and a third person camera for shooting around corners, and a crosshair? Which Rainbow six too? The few last ones are like arcade games.....

Vegas. How does the third person camera contribute to  no realism? When you blind fire it's so inaccurate, you best off not fire at all. As for the regenerating health it takes longer to regenerate the more shots you take. and you have little health...One head shot with any gun to the head and your dead. The cross hairs only appear when your standing still, they disappear once you start moving.

[The Red Guy]

I thought you said you were getting internet soon TBC? =/

[Dascoo]

Model of my card is a GEForce 7600 I think. its an Nvidia and it set me back about 200 bucks (I have a small PC case, which in turn leaves me with a small motherboard....so I had to get a PCI card)
Let me get back to you on that one.

Anyway....does anyone have any recommendations for good Modern war (no Si-Fi crap) OFFLINE games?

I'm pretty sure there's no 7600 PCI card (I'm not 100% sure). Also, PCI is your problem.

GRAW 2's multiplayer rocks! It actually feels like you're the soldier unlike BF2 where it's stiff.

Red Orchestra does it better

Rainbow Six Does it even better, not to mention the insanely awesome realism in the game.

So you're telling me Rainbow six does realism better when it has regeneratable health, and a third person camera for shooting around corners, and a crosshair? Which Rainbow six too? The few last ones are like arcade games.....

Vegas. How does the third person camera contribute to  no realism? When you blind fire it's so inaccurate, you best off not fire at all. As for the regenerating health it takes longer to regenerate the more shots you take. and you have little health...One head shot with any gun to the head and your dead. The cross hairs only appear when your standing still, they disappear once you start moving.

Yeah and in Red Orchestra there's no third person camera because people are not magical, and in RO people don't regenerate health BECAUSE PEOPLE DO NOT MAGICALLY RECOVER FROM A BULLET WOUND. Also, if it were a realism based game there should be no crosshair at all. Aim down your sites.

Your argument fails, Red Orchestra does realism MUCH better. Go ask a friend who has it for a free trial so you can see why...

Also, a bunch of Terrorists in Vegas never happend, World War 2 did.

[Valorman]

Model of my card is a GEForce 7600 I think. its an Nvidia and it set me back about 200 bucks (I have a small PC case, which in turn leaves me with a small motherboard....so I had to get a PCI card)
Let me get back to you on that one.

Anyway....does anyone have any recommendations for good Modern war (no Si-Fi crap) OFFLINE games?

I'm pretty sure there's no 7600 PCI card (I'm not 100% sure). Also, PCI is your problem.

GRAW 2's multiplayer rocks! It actually feels like you're the soldier unlike BF2 where it's stiff.

Red Orchestra does it better

Rainbow Six Does it even better, not to mention the insanely awesome realism in the game.

So you're telling me Rainbow six does realism better when it has regeneratable health, and a third person camera for shooting around corners, and a crosshair? Which Rainbow six too? The few last ones are like arcade games.....

Vegas. How does the third person camera contribute to  no realism? When you blind fire it's so inaccurate, you best off not fire at all. As for the regenerating health it takes longer to regenerate the more shots you take. and you have little health...One head shot with any gun to the head and your dead. The cross hairs only appear when your standing still, they disappear once you start moving.

Yeah and in Red Orchestra there's no third person camera because people are not magical, and in RO people don't regenerate health BECAUSE PEOPLE DO NOT MAGICALLY RECOVER FROM A BULLET WOUND. Also, if it were a realism based game there should be no crosshair at all. Aim down your sites.

Your argument fails, Red Orchestra does realism MUCH better. Go ask a friend who has it for a free trial so you can see why...

Also, a bunch of Terrorists in Vegas never happend, World War 2 did.

How many World War 2 shooters have their been so far? a ****load. I'm sure Ubisoft wanted to create a new setting for a game, which is Vegas, and the setting is great. The third Person is for getting a better shot off and you cant just go into third person. You go into third person once you put your back to cover so it seems logical for the game going into third person. Once you take your back off its back to first person. I agree with you on the regeneration but Its something new compared to the boring old "pick up the med kit". I dunno if RO uses those.  And when you peek out from cover to shoot, the animation shows the soldier aiming down the sights.

[blackdevil0742]

I tried Vegas and i agree that it doesn't feel so realistic. But I do believe that GRAW 2 has better realism to it than RO. All the moves in GRAW 2 feel real and as in RO you can only take one or two bullets before you go down. Also you can't blame games for doing own imaginary stories when WW1 and WW2 have been used so much, it gets boring to go over the same **** everytime I play a new fps with that.

Then again i haven't tried RO but these new Tom Clancy games are very well done and newer so I assume that they're better at the "feeling" part

EDIT: Gonna post this anyway considered that he posted that just before me and I can't bother to change ;/

[Dascoo]

How many World War 2 shooters have their been so far? a ****load. I'm sure Ubisoft wanted to create a new setting for a game, which is Vegas, and the setting is great. The third Person is for getting a better shot off and you cant just go into third person. You go into third person once you put your back to cover so it seems logical for the game going into third person. Once you take your back off its back to first person. I agree with you on the regeneration but Its something new compared to the boring old "pick up the med kit". I dunno if RO uses those.  And when you peek out from cover to shoot, the animation shows the soldier aiming down the sights.

As far as I know, there have been only two games which have a russian front in them and that's Call of duty 2, and some cheap game besides RO. The Russian front has been barely touched, let alone Africa and freedom fighters in occupied countries. With third person view you can look around corners without exposing yourself....it's like me going up to a corner, not even peaking out and I can see where the enemy is and direct fire towards that position. No there are no medkits in Red Orchestra, you're stuck with your injury as you would be in real life. I also like how RO has different hit zones. Same with aiming down your sites......

[SDFilm]

Ya, RO is very realistic and the eastern front was a nice change at least in the FPS genre. For SWAT style games, my brother brought SWAT 4 instead of Vagas, and I think he done that as Vagas was relatively arcady.