0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Clawbug on January 28, 2008, 04:20:48 pmRemove bink, lower damage and fireinterval, that could be one solution.Second DEagles?... Straight shooting, so "better DEagles"?
Remove bink, lower damage and fireinterval, that could be one solution.
Quote from: † on April 14, 2008, 01:25:20 pmTo sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)And we still don't know if dead guys can keep a stiffy.
To sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)
I'll only take notice of what Ruger-haters have to say when they give a legitimate reason as to why the gun sucks.
Quote from: O.R.I.O.N. on January 29, 2008, 11:19:12 amI'll only take notice of what Ruger-haters have to say when they give a legitimate reason as to why the gun sucks.They dont say it sucks, theyre saying its max potential is too high compared to what other weapons offer. Even if you practice a year with steyr you cant kill everyone in like .67, but if you practice around 2 weeks with ruger you can get to do that on a lot of guys, without even getting hit.
Quote from: Ziem on January 28, 2008, 11:38:14 pmQuote from: Clawbug on January 28, 2008, 04:20:48 pmRemove bink, lower damage and fireinterval, that could be one solution.Second DEagles?... Straight shooting, so "better DEagles"?That's just a stupid comment. Do you really think "lower damage and fireinterval" means "cut damage by 25% and halve the fireinterval"?
So we could have a desert eagle which surely kills on mid-long range in 2 kills, fires a tad slower and only has one less ammo.Great! No.My opinion would be giving it movement inaccuracy, so it'd be a bit closer to the one shot guns ( and mainly, the barret ) in terms of proper usage.
Ruger owns , IMO.
I personally think Ruger is perfectly fine. It actually is similar to deagle, except it's a 'rifle'. Therefore, it has to be stronger than deagle. As STM said, around 2~3 hits on anywhere. However, it should have an inaccuracy as barret when moving. Not only the ruger is the same as barret in the weapon type, a rifle. So it is a little reasonable that ruger should have an inaccuracy while moving.
Ruger is not a "Perfect Weapon". Ruger shoots slowly, also it will loose its accuracy easily as barret when you get shot. If that's the case, then all the autos are able to take the people with ruger easily. As an example, Aker and AUGer can just shoot you and you'll lose the accuracy and start having a bigger bink(*Am I using this word right?).
The Ruger is not overpowered at all.
The real problem with ruger is it's max. potential - 2 shots and kill in less than a second... and it's easy to use.