Author Topic: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)  (Read 11532 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #60 on: August 05, 2007, 03:20:49 pm »
test9 crashes

Offline EnEsCe

  • Retired Soldat Developer
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3101
  • http://enesce.com/
    • [eC] Official Website
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #61 on: August 05, 2007, 09:27:09 pm »
Thanks for pasting a log flab...

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #62 on: August 05, 2007, 09:30:41 pm »
sorry, it was running detached.  I'll get you a log

edit: http://ryan.u13.net/1186508816.log
« Last Edit: August 07, 2007, 03:03:11 pm by FliesLikeABrick »

Offline EnEsCe

  • Retired Soldat Developer
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3101
  • http://enesce.com/
    • [eC] Official Website
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #63 on: August 07, 2007, 09:57:51 pm »
Excellent, could you get one more new one to confirm its the same numbers?

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #64 on: August 07, 2007, 10:06:49 pm »
sure, I'll post up a bunch of them in a minute

http://ryan.u13.net/logs

Offline zyxstand

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1106
  • Mother of all Bombs
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #65 on: August 08, 2007, 07:07:37 pm »
looks like 1.4.2 (and 2.6.2) aren't due till... a few weeks.
Can't think of anything original to put here...

Offline Snipufin

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #66 on: August 09, 2007, 03:22:04 am »
looks like 1.4.2 (and 2.6.2) aren't due till... a few weeks.
agreed...
Quote
Name:     Snipufin
Posts:    111 (1.11 per day)
Position:    Soldier
Karma:    -11

Offline Clawbug

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1393
  • 1184!
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #67 on: August 09, 2007, 04:02:34 am »
Is that good or bad?
Fight! Win! Prevail!

Offline EnEsCe

  • Retired Soldat Developer
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3101
  • http://enesce.com/
    • [eC] Official Website
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #68 on: August 09, 2007, 05:27:06 am »
Ok this time try with Debug_Mode=3 (-debug 3), and paste terminal logs.

Offline Sauron

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 169
  • Call me "Uncle Sam"
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #69 on: August 09, 2007, 11:36:18 am »
With this speed of testing, we have to wait a long time.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2007, 11:43:19 am by Sauron »

Offline Clawbug

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1393
  • 1184!
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #70 on: August 09, 2007, 11:43:08 am »
They do everything they can and they know what they are doing. Just a matter of time.
Fight! Win! Prevail!

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #71 on: August 09, 2007, 11:51:10 am »
Ok this time try with Debug_Mode=3 (-debug 3), and paste terminal logs.

won't that cause a crazy performance hit?

Offline EnEsCe

  • Retired Soldat Developer
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3101
  • http://enesce.com/
    • [eC] Official Website
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #72 on: August 09, 2007, 09:35:04 pm »
Not really, debug mode 3 is scripting debug. We found the function its in.

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #73 on: August 09, 2007, 09:37:49 pm »
« Last Edit: August 09, 2007, 09:39:36 pm by FliesLikeABrick »

Offline Sauron

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 169
  • Call me "Uncle Sam"
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #74 on: August 10, 2007, 01:06:53 am »
Enesce, How much time do you need to made Server 2.6.2 without Errors?

Offline SirJamesaford

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 763
  • SirJamesaford is still in the early Beta stage.
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #75 on: August 10, 2007, 01:09:03 am »
With this speed of testing, we have to wait a long time.

Enesce, How much time do you need to made Server 2.6.2 without Errors?
Dude fuck off...let them do what they do.  Theyre working as hard as they can i'm sure.  Its better to release a server without bugs that takes a while longer than to release a server with bugs that takes no time.
And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forebodings too
Ill see you on the dark side of the moon

Offline Sauron

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 169
  • Call me "Uncle Sam"
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #76 on: August 10, 2007, 01:18:04 am »
Quote
Dude **** off...let them do what they do.  Theyre working as hard as they can i'm sure.  Its better to release a server without bugs that takes a while longer than to release a server with bugs that takes no time. 
I think it as good no bad.it`s irony. 8)

Offline Clawbug

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1393
  • 1184!
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #77 on: August 10, 2007, 02:07:47 am »
Agreed with SirJamesaford. They do what they can do to fix the issue, and they are working on it. Just be patient please.
Fight! Win! Prevail!

Offline EnEsCe

  • Retired Soldat Developer
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3101
  • http://enesce.com/
    • [eC] Official Website
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #78 on: August 10, 2007, 02:10:51 am »
Sauron stay out of this topic for your own good. Anyone who posts here should only be people who are actually contributing by posting logs. Not people who are acting like leeching trolls.

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: SS version 2.6.2 test (8)
« Reply #79 on: August 10, 2007, 10:14:18 am »
I unfortunately have to agree with EnEsCe on this.  Posting here to ask "when will it be fixed?" is just cluttering up the topic and making it much harder for anyone who comes here looking for information to find it.

edit: (I say unfortunately because I don't want to tell someone "gtfo of this topic," but that's the way it is unless you have something to contribute here)