0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Anna on August 06, 2007, 11:02:32 amA fetus is essentially a parasite. It requires its host's body to survive. Forcing a woman to continue to be pregnant, allowing the fetus to use her body against her will, is in violation of her right to bodily autonomy.So lem'me get this straight.Even if you're talking about a wrongly conceived child through rape, you're deciding to kill what could have been a perfectly normal person who could contribute to society very well, and who very improbably although not impossibly could have been a genius who could forward advances in mankind technologically or otherwise over a woman's feelings?Even if the baby has been scanned to have a disorder, or will be born crippled, there have STILL been influential persons in history with said physical setbacks. If there is reasonable suspicion that a natural birthing may cause the mother to die, then a caesarean section can be performed. There's no excuse; the woman's just being totally selfish then to kill it off. I'm not even going into religious arguments!
A fetus is essentially a parasite. It requires its host's body to survive. Forcing a woman to continue to be pregnant, allowing the fetus to use her body against her will, is in violation of her right to bodily autonomy.
By that logic, we shouldn't treat people who contract sexually transmitted diseases unless they were raped.
1. Most fat people are not fat by choice. To imply that they are is the basis of fat hatred in this society.2. Consent to sex != consent to pregnancy. I guess you only hate women who have sex for pleasure.
Already born babies are no longer parasites and no longer require the use of a uterus to survive. The woman can choose to raise it herself or give it up for adoption.
What gives you the right to make this decision? How do you make this calculation?A kidney is a small price to pay to allow someone live the rest of their life. Should we force people to donate their kidneys to people who will die if they don't get a kidney transplant?edit: Also, most abortions occur in the first trimester. The death of a small clump of cells is a small price to pay compared to the risks and costs of pregnancy, birth, and childcare.
You can stop pretending that you care about the fetus, it's clear that all you're concerned with is controlling women's sexuality.
But it is still human, and all humans have a survival instinct, and all humans deserve to live and have a chance at life.
It doesn't matter if the fetus has a chance at life or not because it lacks any kind of consciousness.
Quote from: Anna on August 06, 2007, 12:07:50 pmYou can stop pretending that you care about the fetus, it's clear that all you're concerned with is controlling women's sexuality.what?
QuoteQuote from: Xxypher on August 06, 2007, 11:35:07 amI am pro-choice... Let women do what they want to their body.I'm all for that too. But most women refuse to abort their own bodies. They'd prefer to abort someone else's.A woman doesn't require the use of another body's resources to survive, so I don't see how she could "abort her own body." Abortion simply removes a fetus from a woman's body. Maybe someday it will be possible to remove a fetus from a uterus without killing it, but that is another issue.
Quote from: Xxypher on August 06, 2007, 11:35:07 amI am pro-choice... Let women do what they want to their body.I'm all for that too. But most women refuse to abort their own bodies. They'd prefer to abort someone else's.
I am pro-choice... Let women do what they want to their body.
Quote from: jrgp on September 30, 2010, 03:36:50 pmOnly anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.so clearly jgrp is a goddamn anime connoisseur. his opinion might as well be law here.
Only anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.
Best Admin: jrgp, he's like the forum mom and a pet dog rolled into one.
Quote from: MegamanX on August 06, 2007, 01:10:02 pmIt doesn't matter if the fetus has a chance at life or not because it lacks any kind of consciousness.So it's perfectly acceptable to euthanize brain-dead people, or people in comas?
You're missing the point.Imagine a married couple. They have unprotected sex, but both know that the woman is in her infertile (correct word? as in not fertile) cycle. After some time they find out the woman is pregnant. The woman doesn't really want the child whereas the man really wants to have his kid. They divorce and go to court.What would your decision and arguments be during the trial?I find that a very difficult question and I wouldn't be able to answer it until I get an idea of how badly the man wants to keep the child and how badly the woman wants to get an abortion.
Quote from: Anna on August 06, 2007, 11:02:32 amA fetus is essentially a parasite. It requires its host's body to survive. Forcing a woman to continue to be pregnant, allowing the fetus to use her body against her will, is in violation of her right to bodily autonomy.So lem'me get this straight.Even if you're talking about a wrongly conceived child through rape, you're deciding to kill what could have been a perfectly normal person who could contribute to society very well, and who very improbably although not impossibly could have been a genius who could forward advances in mankind technologically or otherwise over a woman's feelings?
Even if the baby has been scanned to have a disorder, or will be born crippled, there have STILL been influential persons in history with said physical setbacks. If there is reasonable suspicion that a natural birthing may cause the mother to die, then a caesarean section can be performed. There's no excuse; the woman's just being totally selfish then to kill it off. I'm not even going into religious arguments!
Control over one's body is a basic human right.
Quote from: Anna on August 06, 2007, 01:54:52 pmControl over one's body is a basic human right.haha irony.
LtKillroy, if that is the case then you are not being logical. You probably think that god exists too?
Having kids is not [a basic human right].
What about the woman's contributions to society? What if she could have been a genius who could forward advances in mankind technologically or otherwise, but instead is stuck with raising a kid?
The fetus is the selfish one. It implants itself into the wall of the uterus and starts growing using resources from the woman's body, all without the woman's permission!
Edit: Not saying I would encourage a rape victim to get an abortion. I really don't know what I would do in that situation.
Quote from: MegamanX on August 06, 2007, 01:56:12 pmLtKillroy, if that is the case then you are not being logical. You probably think that god exists too?So what, your a Nazi, killing everyone who is useless? It is just sick to kill anyone. I consider abortion murder, what do you consider it? Getting rid of useless cells? Clipping your toenails is getiig rid if useless cells, destroying a fetus is taking a life that is just not smart yet.