0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Anna on August 06, 2007, 04:39:43 pmQuote from: LtKillroy on August 06, 2007, 04:29:36 pmNeither, it is pushing the woman to take responsibility when they have sex, no matter when or how. I guess special cases it could be allowed, I'd have to think about that some more, but in the 99% of cases, woman have to take responsibility for their actions and not just kill the baby. And yes, the fetus is a human. If you plant, say, a rose and it germanates and sprouts roots, then you rip out the plant, are you not killing a rose? Same thing here.You can't have it both ways. If the argument for making abortion illegal is to preserve fetal life, then you can't have an exception for rape victims, because that implies that a fetus that is the result of rape is worth less than a fetus that is the result of consensual sex. If the argument is that women should be forced to give birth because they consented to the sex that resulted in their pregnancy, then don't pretend to care about fetal life.I never said either way, I said I'll think about it, and you just changed my mind. And you failed to talk about the other points, and I would like them answered.
Quote from: LtKillroy on August 06, 2007, 04:29:36 pmNeither, it is pushing the woman to take responsibility when they have sex, no matter when or how. I guess special cases it could be allowed, I'd have to think about that some more, but in the 99% of cases, woman have to take responsibility for their actions and not just kill the baby. And yes, the fetus is a human. If you plant, say, a rose and it germanates and sprouts roots, then you rip out the plant, are you not killing a rose? Same thing here.You can't have it both ways. If the argument for making abortion illegal is to preserve fetal life, then you can't have an exception for rape victims, because that implies that a fetus that is the result of rape is worth less than a fetus that is the result of consensual sex. If the argument is that women should be forced to give birth because they consented to the sex that resulted in their pregnancy, then don't pretend to care about fetal life.
Neither, it is pushing the woman to take responsibility when they have sex, no matter when or how. I guess special cases it could be allowed, I'd have to think about that some more, but in the 99% of cases, woman have to take responsibility for their actions and not just kill the baby. And yes, the fetus is a human. If you plant, say, a rose and it germanates and sprouts roots, then you rip out the plant, are you not killing a rose? Same thing here.
Do you really believe abortion isn't taking a life? If you don't, I point to the rose example, if you do, how can you say it should be legal.
You say it is the woman's right, but everyone in the United States has equal rights and deserves to live.
Also, this shouldn't even be an argument becuase if the woman didn't want to have a kid so bad she shouldn't have had sex. Some then say they think of sex as a pleasure, but the Zodiac killer said killing was a pleasure, is murder okay for him now. Birth control isn't the issue here, abstinance and taking responsibility is.
1. No, I think you fail to see the metaphor there, you are killing a human, which, last time I checked, was illegal, so abortion should be too
2. Yes, it does make them more special, we have to kill animals to live, we don't have to kill humans to live.
3. Again, you dodge the question. What about the 99% who do consent to rape. And yes, it is hard and tramatic, but you'll live even if you have to give up the child.
Quote from: LtKillroy on August 06, 2007, 05:32:42 pm1. No, I think you fail to see the metaphor there, you are killing a human, which, last time I checked, was illegal, so abortion should be tooBut killing a human isn't always illegal. For example, it is legal to kill someone in self-defense.Quote2. Yes, it does make them more special, we have to kill animals to live, we don't have to kill humans to live.But we don't need to kill animals to live. We could all be vegetarians.Quote3. Again, you dodge the question. What about the 99% who do consent to rape. And yes, it is hard and tramatic, but you'll live even if you have to give up the child.No, you're dodging my question. What about the 1% who do not consent to sex?
HOW IS KILLING A FETUS SELF DEFENSE?
But why is it ok to kill animals and not fetuses? Is there something about human life that makes it more special than other forms of life?
...Laughing is a pleasure. Pleasure is just a side effect of having a child so you do it more.
To rebut Perro:Who cares if I kill some random bum with no friends, no one would miss him? Killing is against the law, even if the victim can't feel it. A human is a human and is protected under law, even if it doesn't care.No, sex isn't about pleasure, that's just what YOU have been taught YOUR own life. I think almost every scientist would agree animals have sex to reproduce, you don't see squirrel hookers, now do you? If sex is a pleasure, why does MAKING ANOTHER LIFE a consequence. Laughing is a pleasure. Pleasure is just a side effect of having a child so you do it more.
And it's your fault if you are dumb enough to get raped.
1. And who cares about the law?
True. But if you didn't want to have a child and are pregnant, you shouldn't be allowed to have an abortion, that's what condoms are for. And it's your fault if you are dumb enough to get raped. And don't ***** to me about broken condoms .
Quote from: Anna on August 06, 2007, 05:36:50 pmQuote from: LtKillroy on August 06, 2007, 05:32:42 pm1. No, I think you fail to see the metaphor there, you are killing a human, which, last time I checked, was illegal, so abortion should be tooBut killing a human isn't always illegal. For example, it is legal to kill someone in self-defense.Quote2. Yes, it does make them more special, we have to kill animals to live, we don't have to kill humans to live.But we don't need to kill animals to live. We could all be vegetarians.Quote3. Again, you dodge the question. What about the 99% who do consent to rape. And yes, it is hard and tramatic, but you'll live even if you have to give up the child.No, you're dodging my question. What about the 1% who do not consent to sex?2. Like I said before, we would indirectly kill them becuase of overpopulation.3. You once again dodge my question and fail to read "And yes, it is hard and tramatic, but you'll live even if you have to give up the child" referring to adoption after it is born.1. Even in self defense, many times you get charged with manslaughter anyway. And the fetus can't fight back.wow, musta messed that up somehow, just follow numbers.
Quote from: ThunderPantz on August 06, 2007, 05:54:42 pmTrue. But if you didn't want to have a child and are pregnant, you shouldn't be allowed to have an abortion, that's what condoms are for. And it's your fault if you are dumb enough to get raped. And don't ***** to me about broken condoms . Woah, what the hell are you saying "its your fault if you are dumb enough to get raped" for? Yeah, I'm totally sure it's the woman's fault for a man raping her. Even if a woman gets raped because she was wearing promiscuous clothing, that does not justify what the idiot did to her.
No, dumb because she wasn't cautious. And if you want sex for pleasure, just masturbate.
Quote from: ThunderPantz on August 06, 2007, 05:54:42 pmTrue. But if you didn't want to have a child and are pregnant, you shouldn't be allowed to have an abortion, that's what condoms are for. And it's your fault if you are dumb enough to get raped. And don't ***** to me about broken condoms . Woah, what the hell are you saying "its your fault if you are dumb enough to get raped" for? Yeah, I'm totally sure it's the woman's fault for a man raping her. Even if a woman gets raped because she was wearing promiscuous clothing, that does not justify what the idiot did to her.Also, broken condoms? Yes, they can break, and therefore they become virtually useless. Sometimes you might have to wear 2.