0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Movable polygons or any different type of polygon function will never be added. It'll require too long of a coding time and would change Soldat's format. No support.
Quote from: miketh2005 on July 10, 2009, 07:31:20 pmDonate to enesceHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Donate to enesce
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.
What would bw nicw as a door substitutw but kwwp thw doorlwss Soldat wnvironmwnt would bw thosw variablw transparwncy polygons that onw guy suggwstwd bwforw. Likw you won't know whats bwhind wm until you contact thw wdgw of thw polygon.
Quote from: Espadon on August 21, 2007, 05:45:15 pmWhat would bw nicw as a door substitutw but kwwp thw doorlwss Soldat wnvironmwnt would bw thosw variablw transparwncy polygons that onw guy suggwstwd bwforw. Likw you won't know whats bwhind wm until you contact thw wdgw of thw polygon.wats with all the w's???
Doors would be nice... And just because Soldat isn't 3D doesn't mean you couldn't have doors .
@Kryp -- go buy some skills. use /command to bring up the commands.
Shouldnt their be working doors in soldat, or atleast movable polygons that moves when you touch it?
The reason behind doors or something similar to act as such would be that you could have semifunctional buildings. Screw moving polygons, that would be a waste of time and moving polygons are never going to happen...as far I can see. For realism, it would be more tactical. You could hide behind a shut door. You could have buildings in ctf with doors to have the flags in, or it would serve as better defensive cover. It would be better for making mission type maps. Alright, instead of doors, how bout the polygons that you couldn't see through, but go through. That would work basically the same way, and if you wanted to, you could also add on top, "only players go through" polygons so it would act as a door or defensive block.Instead of having wannabe doors, you would have actual doors, yay! They could be simple. Well, kinda.
Doors are NEVER going to be implemented in Soldat.Lock please.
→ New map features: weapon spawns, animated graphics in maps, power-ups, improvements in bot-behavior/waypoints, etc. (Marcinkowski himself declared that just about any suggestions regarding new map features will be ignored unless he specifically announces that the map format shall be changed, which he most likely shall not anymore due to the time-absorbing Crimson Glory project)→ Destructible terrain, liquids, VEHICLES, mobile polygons (these would require a gigantic map format change as already covered above, they would be huge changes to gameplay which would disgust many players, even more glitches would result from them, etc.)
Wow...."NO NEW MAP FEATURES""NO MOBILE POLYGONS"
I would rather use a poly you can walk through but cannot see through, to use in Realistic mode or something. No need for moving polys, this would practically do the same thing.
Quote from: † on April 14, 2008, 01:25:20 pmTo sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)And we still don't know if dead guys can keep a stiffy.
To sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)
Argh. What if there were polys that you can trigger the physical transparensy with some kind of trigger poly, like shoot a "switch" poly, or step on it, and another goes intangible untill it's re-activated. Beats the crap out of mobile polys.
Forget it...whatever I mentioned doesn't work since you actually can still see through the polygons . Hmm, I suppose if it was possible to make a normal poly skinny enough to go through, but not see through... I'll experiment with that sometime.
