0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yeah, I remember the old forum. When someone was angry it would be likeYOU ING ERS I HATE YOU GO YOUR DOG IN THE HOLE WITH A DAMN BARRETARDS
Replace every curse with "ZOINKS"
Putting the classic curse smiley in the mix is no problem. However replaced the "*" is the problem echo, and thats what we are talking about.
Quote from: †on October 03, 2007, 01:47:41 pmPutting the classic curse smiley in the mix is no problem. However replaced the "*" is the problem echo, and thats what we are talking about.Oh, sorry. You must've lost me. How is that a problem again?
Quote from: echo_trail on October 03, 2007, 05:10:14 pmQuote from: †on October 03, 2007, 01:47:41 pmPutting the classic curse smiley in the mix is no problem. However replaced the "*" is the problem echo, and thats what we are talking about.Oh, sorry. You must've lost me. How is that a problem again? Seems we can't agree... if and we can't agree then how are we suppose to annoy bricks about the subject enough to change it?
Every swear word is replaced with a random word from a big word database!Could make for some interresting posts.
Quote from: Psycho on October 03, 2007, 05:17:40 pmEvery swear word is replaced with a random word from a big word database!Could make for some interresting posts.YOU STUPID orange GO TO redING porch! Yeah that would be funny. Let's do it.
Quote from: †on April 14, 2008, 01:25:20 pmTo sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)And we still don't know if dead guys can keep a stiffy.
To sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)
Hmm... How come we actually need a swearfilter?
So? No one takes any damage from reading words like that. and it's not like they don't allready know them.
Quote from: echo_trail on October 08, 2007, 06:21:09 pmSo? No one takes any damage from reading words like that. and it's not like they don't allready know them.That may be true but its not our place to assume some of the kids here are already exposed or still in the dark. Its also not our place to assume some of the parents of the members here will condone the fact of their kids reading curse words. Also we have used a filter on the forums since the beginning. No sense in changing that.
Quote from: echo_trail on October 08, 2007, 06:21:09 pmSo? No one takes any damage from reading words like that. and it's not like they don't allready know them.True i know them xD and im young.. but you never know...there might be some kid reading this learning from what we say...
Quote from: †on October 08, 2007, 09:52:32 pmQuote from: echo_trail on October 08, 2007, 06:21:09 pmSo? No one takes any damage from reading words like that. and it's not like they don't allready know them.That may be true but its not our place to assume some of the kids here are already exposed or still in the dark. Its also not our place to assume some of the parents of the members here will condone the fact of their kids reading curse words. Also we have used a filter on the forums since the beginning. No sense in changing that.I think there was a point where it wasn't enforced if you went around it however.
Quote from: Kagesha on October 08, 2007, 09:14:01 pmQuote from: echo_trail on October 08, 2007, 06:21:09 pmSo? No one takes any damage from reading words like that. and it's not like they don't allready know them.True i know them xD and im young.. but you never know...there might be some kid reading this learning from what we say...By golly, I hope not.. Well, I never thought we should take away the swear filter. It's been put there for obvious reasons. Just a thought anyway..Ey Cookie.. Could you actually bypass the swearing filter or what?
how can anyone be taken serioursly now? that ugly face will steal the meaning of each and every topic.
Thankyou! case closed.qft=?
This is teh BANNING KAT!!!!http://i23.tinypic.com/2qs1hqe.jpg