0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
TiReD -"3. Crappy clip that is capable of killing 2 players without reloading."Deagles kill 2 ppl, mp5, styer too... ak, minimi about 3, socom kills 2 ppl, spas can kill 3 ppl. (and barret can kill 10 ppl without reloading! xD) (ah, knife can kill 65535 people without reloading<ovrpwrd! ovrpwrd!>)excruciator - ".75 seconds" ?? huh ?? ... nice stats. It's about 0.5. (aim+shoot, delay+shoot)
Quote from: † on April 14, 2008, 01:25:20 pmTo sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)And we still don't know if dead guys can keep a stiffy.
To sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)
Not agreeing doesn't make me biased, I agree it is a bit better in certain situations but so are other guns. My point is skill and play style are much greater factors than the gun. I use the ruger on certain maps but otherwise if I am playing to win I use the steyr, maybe I should play some gathers and upload demos instead of just insisting other guns are good.
Quote from: ElGato on October 24, 2007, 12:11:12 pmNot agreeing doesn't make me biased, I agree it is a bit better in certain situations but so are other guns. My point is skill and play style are much greater factors than the gun. I use the ruger on certain maps but otherwise if I am playing to win I use the steyr, maybe I should play some gathers and upload demos instead of just insisting other guns are good.Funny to hear from a well known rugerer
1. It doesnt have bink.
2. The movement acc isnt a problem when it only takes around 1 second to kill.
3. Crappy clip that is capable of killing 2 players without reloading.
4. Slow rate of fire that can feck any non-1 hit killer without getting too damaged.
Should weapons be judged for what they can do, or for what they do on unexperienced hands?.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.
Quote from: excruciator on October 24, 2007, 02:29:34 pmQuote from: ElGato on October 24, 2007, 12:11:12 pmNot agreeing doesn't make me biased, I agree it is a bit better in certain situations but so are other guns. My point is skill and play style are much greater factors than the gun. I use the ruger on certain maps but otherwise if I am playing to win I use the steyr, maybe I should play some gathers and upload demos instead of just insisting other guns are good.Funny to hear from a well known rugererI played him an hour ago, he used the Steyr.*EDIT*Quote from: TiReD on October 23, 2007, 10:50:38 pm1. It doesnt have bink.Looks like someone forgot the difference between bink and self bink...Quote from: TiReD on October 23, 2007, 10:50:38 pm2. The movement acc isnt a problem when it only takes around 1 second to kill.1: Stat pulled out of ass.2: What do those 2 statements have to do with each other? Again, I think you need to go and look up what "movement acc" is. Along with bink.Quote from: TiReD on October 23, 2007, 10:50:38 pm3. Crappy clip that is capable of killing 2 players without reloading.Yeah, how often are you going to get 4 headshots in a row while under fire (and thus getting binked) from 2 people? Barret can kill 10 people with one clip, whoop-de-fecking-doo.Quote from: TiReD on October 23, 2007, 10:50:38 pm4. Slow rate of fire that can feck any non-1 hit killer without getting too damaged.Ahahahahaha....haha......Seriously, why don't you go and test these bullfeck theories instead of spouting them as fact? And yes, Quote from: TiReD on October 23, 2007, 10:50:38 pmShould weapons be judged for what they can do, or for what they do on unexperienced hands?.They should. You realize not everyone who plays Soldat is a pro? And it's not like a skilled ruger user is invincible; all your "examples" of overpoweredness seem to involve 2 things. A couple Boogie Men and a master rugerer.
alright as a big fan of ruger i hate you..lol but,1. No one uses ruger cause its not easy to master2. There is no "noob" gun. MM has made all weapons blances perfect3. stop ur whinning4. i still hate you
"Ch00b" is a runescape term. It tells us something about excruciator, guys.
Should weapons be judged for what they can do, or for what they do on unexperienced hands?
And it's not like a skilled ruger user is invincible
...do you think its fecking underpowered to kill 2 rushing guys and be left with 50% health?
1. The ruger doesnt have BINK nor SELF BINK
Quote from: TiReD on October 24, 2007, 06:22:57 pm...do you think its fecking underpowered to kill 2 rushing guys and be left with 50% health?...Not this feck again. You say the ruger is overpowered in competitive playing, and yet you say that 2 people rushing a single ruger user won't be able to kill him easily? Unless those 2 rushers suck badly there is no way (Okay, there is a way, but it's NOT going to happen 90% of the time).that rugerer is gonna live, unless he has some other advantage (height, collider, nade trap...). Sure, he may kill one of them, but saying he can survive with 50% health against 2 good players if a very extreme example.And no, I don't think it's underpowered. I like it more or less the way it is, although I wouldn't mind the fire rate going down a bit.Quote from: .::Blaze::. on October 24, 2007, 06:40:29 pm1. The ruger doesnt have BINK nor SELF BINK...Check your weapons.ini plz.As for "I realize that not everyone is pro, but that doesnt stop me from wanting a more balanced game on publics or clan wars."That's a tough one, as obviously there won't ever be a perfect balance for both of them. This is what weapon modding is for.
Quote from: TiReD on October 24, 2007, 06:22:57 pm1. The ruger doesnt have BINK nor SELF BINKExcuse me... Are you an idiot... Ruger does have bink. It's just not much. Just because it doesn't have alot of it doesn't make it non-existant. It's like me saying to a jewish person, oh it's okay, because you are only half a jew, They are still jewish. Duh.
Quote from: .::Blaze::. on October 24, 2007, 06:40:29 pmalright as a big fan of ruger i hate you..lol but,1. No one uses ruger cause its not easy to master2. There is no "noob" gun. MM has made all weapons blances perfect3. stop ur whinning4. i still hate you1 point...so not true...Gimmi one week, and I will pwn you in a 1 on 1 with the ruger.Date Posted: October 24, 2007, 08:03:32 pmQuote from: Espadon on October 24, 2007, 05:24:19 pm"Ch00b" is a runescape term. It tells us something about excruciator, guys.yeap I used to play it, and your knowledge of the term also tells something about you too.Date Posted: October 24, 2007, 08:04:47 pmQuoteShould weapons be judged for what they can do, or for what they do on unexperienced hands?The best quote I've heard in a long time.lord, it doesnt take 4 headshot to make 2 kill, it takes 2 chest, or any combination of head and legs.also dont make extreme examples if you can't defend your argument.yeah, there isnt a lot of pro, but the weapon still has to be balanced by potencial, not how many noobs are playing. (its only logical to do so)QuoteAnd it's not like a skilled ruger user is invincibletrue, but then again, the only weapon that is most likely to be able to counter ruger is the barrett, but the fact is that barrett has twice as much bink and moviment acc(not accurate but close). and also it has a delay. See how much difference there is between a 2 hitter and a 1 hitter?So which is more likely? a pro rugerer or a pro barrett?
By the way, cant you guys argue without disqualifying the person youre arguing with?