flashbangs and smoke grenades

[Nightcrawler]

Flash Bangs and Smoke Grenades are too CS.

[EnEsCe]

man some of the reasons you guys come up with are just lame... ^^

[Mr. Domino]

I think smoke grenades could be interesting as a means to obscure the vision for one hit weapons. With all the complaints that those weapons receive, I'm surprised more aren't behind this idea. Being able to obscure your position from an enemy is always a good thing.

[Nfsjunkie91]

You may say they're too CS, but CS was one of the main inspirations for MM. Also, have you noticed that  a lot of the guns' sounds are from CS? Hmmmm? Saying it's too CS supports the cause!

I vote yes for both of 'em.

[Sotija]

What sounds? didnt noticed.

[Plonkoon]

I used to be a supporter of more nade types but now I just think it would complicate soldat.

[Will]

Why are u guys always against complicating soldat???

[air139]

Flash bang could bling like when you lose your hearing with a reg nade, and smoke could obscure vision like polies do in a realistic game... I like the idea... but now that I think about it, know how many smokes and strobes would be going off!?!?!?

[Hello There]

No, no. They are too pwnage and you could easily win any match 

[-Vis-]

Like those annoying 11 year olds on CS, hitting me with a flashbang then slashing me up with a knife.  I suck at CS. I don't want soldat to get like that 

[tjg92]

I think it would be a good addition. Mainly for realistic though.

Smoke grenades aren't usually used for cover, but for signalling, distractions, and to confuse the hell out of someone.

For instance, you can kind of control where someone goes with smoke grenades. Just plop one over a path you don't want the enemy to take and wait with teamates in the other path and they'll go to you instead of to the smoke. People usually don't run through massive clouds of smoke because you don't know if someone could be lurking in there with a chainsaw or whatever.

Flashbangs are ok, but not as good as smoke grenades. I personally wouldn't use them that much. They can be really usefull in realistic mode though, since enemies can't see you lob one over a corner. Then you can just run in and shoot 'em up while they can't see.

[a-4-year-old]

Like call of duty when u try to get that flag while the enemy doesn't see you

That is exactly what we dont want. We want a game that isnt just a copy of some other game. otherwise we would just all go buy a game with the same shit in it and better graphics.

[-WildBill-]

yeah, flashbangs would be abused, like teamflashing n such. smokes could work in realistic, i guess, like if it acts like a couple of polygons with "no collide" that sorta follow the smoke, but you cant see past them (as if there was a wall there or something)

[Gold]

well 29 people vote yes for atleast one and only 26 vote no, Flashbang is a no no, smoke grenade is a good idea because it would just create a mist of some sort?

[{LAW} Gamer_2k4]

Soldat in no way is going to ever be close to cs. so stop comparing them!!

Of course it's never going to be close.  Soldat is much better than Counterstrike (I own both of them).  I don't think the action is as intense in CS, and when it is, it's the wrong kind of intensity ("wow this is intense" *dies*).

[Commander Kitsune]

Meh turn to argue 

I voted both no because (as some of you may have seen before) NADE SPAMMERS...even if there are only one or two of either nade think about it. *2smoke 1flash 4nades* equals one laggy game...think 'bout it. soldat doesnt need anymore nades...its fine as is right now 

[The Bone Collector]

Flash nades would come in handy for them campers. Throw a flashbang, take cover..*poof*...Camper: "ZOMG HAXXORZ, U FLASHED ME!" *knife kill the sucker while he's blinded*

sounds like fun

[Will]

Hmm I think smoke nades would be balanced if there was only one man to carry em. I mean if a guy picks up the powerup then there bare no  smoke powerups spawning until he's dead