Author Topic: Tanks, lawl  (Read 4208 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zeating

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Tanks, lawl
« on: December 08, 2007, 04:46:03 pm »
It whould be good if there were tanks, and if they made TW official like in the new verison it will come with TW maps, and a option to make a TW game...and of course come with a tank on each team..make it more like war

Offline Scorpian

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
  • Republican
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2007, 04:58:44 pm »
No, just no.

Sticky, kthxbai.

Offline ~Niko~

  • Rainbow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2410
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2007, 05:15:10 pm »
NO.

Read the damn don't-suggest list!

Offline BondJamesBond

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
    • http://tobylands.com
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2007, 05:35:38 pm »
Make tank scenery.
The computer is a moron.
?  - Peter Drucker

El_Spec

  • Guest
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2007, 06:28:14 pm »
Never will be added.  Instead, wait for MM's new game instead because it'll have vehicles. 

Soldat never will vehicles because it's simplicity is what made it popular in the first place.  Adding vehicles would ruin the game and it's popularity.

Offline Ãœberschall

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 165
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2007, 07:22:23 pm »
Never will be added.  Instead, wait for MM's new game instead because it'll have vehicles. 

Soldat never will vehicles because it's simplicity is what made it popular in the first place.  Adding vehicles would ruin the game and it's popularity.

That's not the point, the point is the MASSIVE coding time it would take.
"Everyone who casts a shadow seems to stand in the sun" ~Wolfsheim

Offline Lord Frunkamunch

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
  • DRR...DRR...DRR...
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2007, 07:34:28 pm »
Never will be added.  Instead, wait for MM's new game instead because it'll have vehicles. 

Soldat never will vehicles because it's simplicity is what made it popular in the first place.  Adding vehicles would ruin the game and it's popularity.

That's bullsh*t. There are many reasons not to include vehicles, but no way in hell is that one of them.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.

Offline Zeating

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2007, 08:31:14 pm »
Just an idea..sorry..:/

Offline Iq Unlimited

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 864
  • mr. foobar2000
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2007, 08:55:28 pm »
Never will be added.  Instead, wait for MM's new game instead because it'll have vehicles. 

Soldat never will vehicles because it's simplicity is what made it popular in the first place.  Adding vehicles would ruin the game and it's popularity.

That's not the point, the point is the MASSIVE coding time it would take.

no, El_Spec's point is more valid. Massive coding yes, but the vehicles would ruin the game.

Offline Zeating

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2007, 10:35:44 pm »
Meh..i guess

Date Posted: December 08, 2007, 10:34:58 pm
Has anyone payed attention to what i said about making TW an offical game type...?

Offline Lord Frunkamunch

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
  • DRR...DRR...DRR...
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2007, 10:38:10 pm »
We might just as well make "Ctf maps with 4 different routes to the flag" an official game mode; TW is nothing more than a fad of similarly made maps played on realistic.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.

Offline valion

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • you may run, you may hide. but still he comes
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2007, 11:53:14 am »
simply, and with full angry and spiteful emotions.
DIE, this is not halo, this is not medal of honour, this is not call of duty.
THIS IS SOLDAT a 2d side scrolling shoot 'em up
Your signature is too big, please read the rules. Keep it under 4 lines of text.

Offline Ãœberschall

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 165
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2007, 12:55:33 pm »
Just an idea..sorry..:/

The "Don't Suggest List" is there for a reason.
"Everyone who casts a shadow seems to stand in the sun" ~Wolfsheim

Offline Kerrazyeye

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 120
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2007, 08:06:24 pm »
Make a tank Scenery, stick it in a map, mod m2 to shoot laws and crap, and stick m2 on the tank.

Offline Noobinabox

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 56
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2007, 12:16:18 am »
Never will be added. Instead, wait for MM's new game instead because it'll have vehicles.

Soldat never will vehicles because it's simplicity is what made it popular in the first place. Adding vehicles would ruin the game and it's popularity.

You're either contradicting yourself, or suggesting that MM's new game will be a flop.
Using your logic, MM's new game will not become popular because of its complex addition of vehicles.

Also, have you ever heard of Hexer or MiracleMod?
You Raff You Ruse.

Offline -Vis-

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
  • Zarch
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2007, 12:32:13 am »
Link Dead's popularity won't be based on the same simplicity Soldat is. There'll be more to the game than jumping, jetting, shooting, nading, capping (eating). Therefore, the vehicles that would be detrimental to Soldat's fast paced load-it-up and shoot-em-up style will not necessarily be so to Link Dead's gameplay.

You can't compare Soldat to Link Dead, especially since we haven't seen enough of Link Dead to be able to judge its gameplay to such an extent.

So take your so-called "logic", and shove it.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2007, 12:34:50 am by -Vis- »


Offline Di3hard

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 24
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #16 on: December 10, 2007, 08:42:23 am »
Dumb idea some idiot would hop in a tank and run around killing people without getting killed untill someone landed 10 nades or m79ed the thing.. and the last thing we need is more m79ers i think you should make it scenery or part of the map so you could hide behind it, might be good for TW anyways back on topic

Tanks = Stupid Idea
Tanks as scenery = Good idea

Offline SDFilm

  • Inactive Staff
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1266
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2007, 08:50:31 am »
This is the 2nd time you've looked over a primary no-no in the stickies.  :-\

We might just as well make "Ctf maps with 4 different routes to the flag" an official game mode; TW is nothing more than a fad of similarly made maps played on realistic.

TW is a good gamemode in its own right, where as 4-route CTF maps are just running on a 'more = better' philosophy.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2007, 08:52:16 am by SDFilm »

Burning scarfs since 1988

Offline Lord Frunkamunch

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
  • DRR...DRR...DRR...
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2007, 10:29:07 am »
All I'm saying is it's still certain ctf maps played on realistic. Maybe it requires different tactics, but hell, so would 4 route ctf.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.

Offline O.R.I.O.N.

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
  • Thunk-a-dunk.
    • Diseased Productions
Re: Tanks, lawl
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2007, 03:44:56 pm »
No vehicles evar. End of story.
To sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)
And we still don't know if dead guys can keep a stiffy.