0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Will on December 14, 2007, 05:11:16 pmwell, I agree with a 4 year old here... don't you just hate when someone posts like 100 posts a day. And he isn't even an administrator or anything.So we regulate number of posts per member? That would be greeted with open arms... >.>
well, I agree with a 4 year old here... don't you just hate when someone posts like 100 posts a day. And he isn't even an administrator or anything.
I was the one who removed Blue Ninja's warnings. He had five previously, which should have been enough to get him perma-banned months ago. He had some constructive and nice posts over the mapping section, so I cut them down.It's not about how much you post, it's about WHAT you post. We're not machines either: none of us is going to keep in mind how long have your warnings been hanging there. If your posts contribute, we will remove the warnings, as the sign that we're noticing a change in behaviour since you got them. Period.
Thanks for telling me after I had my 1st warning for more than half a year -_-
Dont you get a PM when you are warned?
Should create a warning system based on warnings per time ratio or warnings per posts ratio.
Quote from: BondJamesBond on December 17, 2007, 01:29:42 amShould create a warning system based on warnings per time ratio or warnings per posts ratio. So when people are about to be banned they just don't post for a while? That kind of system is way to flawed.
Quote from: † on December 20, 2007, 06:02:53 pmQuote from: BondJamesBond on December 17, 2007, 01:29:42 amShould create a warning system based on warnings per time ratio or warnings per posts ratio. So when people are about to be banned they just don't post for a while? That kind of system is way to flawed.Well if someone goes say 300 posts without getting a warning it should auto reduce one warning.
Well the system we have now (3-6 months) is lots more than 300 postsBesides, change can be short lived.
I took a look:Warning I: August 2 2006Warning II: August 19 2006Warning III: October 26 2007It speaks for itself.
Quote from: Yes on December 20, 2007, 05:20:14 pmWhy would you hate someone if their fat? I think anyone is cool just as long as their not a total asshole.that policy sucks, you suck. Go die.
Why would you hate someone if their fat? I think anyone is cool just as long as their not a total asshole.
thats exactly why we have the fisting forum.
Quote from: a-4-year-old on December 20, 2007, 07:55:29 pmthats exactly why we have the fisting forum.You post like that outside the fisting forum though. It's stupidly obvious you will never get a warning removed... I have no idea how you cannot see that...