Author Topic: Back fire/smoke for law.  (Read 2772 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PaFel

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1628
  • Weaponology Expert
    • PaFcio TACTIACAL
Back fire/smoke for law.
« on: December 24, 2007, 09:08:19 am »
How about adding the graphic that would appear behind the LAW when shootin'? It would look more realistic 'cause all of gazes that are maden when the grenade shoots goes to the back. It would be also good to make the smoke not dissapearin momentaly but stays few seconds. It would be also good to add the same gfx but deafulty transparent to all weapons 'cause of moding possibilities.

Offline Thinkto urself

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 619
  • grrrrr
    • sup
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2007, 01:37:44 pm »
That might get in the way of some other mods, but if there's an option to turn it on and off, F12!!!

"An anomaly of the sea, shrouded in ubiquitous clouds, a mystery to the man as black holes to the world's smartest physicists"

Offline a-4-year-old

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2007, 04:12:22 pm »
That might get in the way of some other mods, but if there's an option to turn it on and off, F12!!!
old mod + blank image = fixt
Old mod + copy default = fixt
Old mod + update = fixt

Your problem is?
If we hit the bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. -Zapp Brannigan

Offline Pie

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2007, 04:24:24 pm »
That might get in the way of some other mods, but if there's an option to turn it on and off, F12!!!
Why would you want to turn off a GFX? That's stupid.

hmmm, i don't like the look of that Ak i might turn it's gfx off.
If it's implemented it's implemented if it isn't then we miss the pretty smoke :D
Lol, internets.

Offline Magic Odd Effect

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2007, 05:16:36 pm »
F12
Don't say that you're Magic. Because you aren't, and I am.
All-around good with weapons that aren't long range, except in TW.
Now be careful out there, soldier.
Best Newbie in the May 2007 Soldatforums Member Awards!

Offline Will

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 910
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2007, 05:54:47 pm »
Well if it gets implemented, it should use a completely different graphic so we could leave blank files if we don't want our mod to use the back fire

Offline TiReD

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 124
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2007, 06:06:58 pm »
If they implement this they would have to change the law smoke, since its used for jets too. (I remember that being a suggestion too.)
« Last Edit: December 24, 2007, 06:08:40 pm by TiReD »
iwishicouldhateyoutodeath
[/color]

Offline Magic Odd Effect

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2007, 09:57:22 pm »
If they implement this they would have to change the law smoke, since its used for jets too. (I remember that being a suggestion too.)
The smoke is only used for trailing behind the missile, and they're talking about a completely different gfx file that makes up the backblast of the LAW.
Don't say that you're Magic. Because you aren't, and I am.
All-around good with weapons that aren't long range, except in TW.
Now be careful out there, soldier.
Best Newbie in the May 2007 Soldatforums Member Awards!

Offline Horve

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 692
  • Vig
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #8 on: December 25, 2007, 10:49:48 pm »
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...

Offline Pie

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #9 on: December 26, 2007, 12:23:58 am »
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...
hmm, well it's better then some suggestions.
 :O O WANTS VEhICLESZORZ!!!! AND I WANTS MA KNIFE TO Shoot LAZORSZ BEAMS!!! AND INSTA KILL J00.

This is actually a good suggestion. Everyone likes soldat being pretty.
Lol, internets.

Offline Psycho

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 677
  • Decomposing
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #10 on: December 26, 2007, 01:47:14 am »
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...

Your post is the only waste of "bites" around here.

The idea sounds pretty neat. Small and simple, those are the kind that MM should have time to implement. Would give a nice effect to fiering the LAW :D

F12

 Looking down from ethereal skies

Offline PaFel

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1628
  • Weaponology Expert
    • PaFcio TACTIACAL
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #11 on: December 26, 2007, 05:12:05 am »
sounds like a COMPLETELY POINTLESS waste of bites...
oh surely it will make soldat 2x better...

But unlike other nice ideas this one would take short time to add and it would make Soldat looks better.

Offline FearTheReaper

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 56
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #12 on: December 26, 2007, 11:11:57 pm »
It would also add the effect of even better pinpointing LAW campers.

Not that it was hard anyway, but F12.

Offline Lord Frunkamunch

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
  • DRR...DRR...DRR...
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #13 on: December 27, 2007, 08:19:40 pm »
F12age.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.

Offline Snake

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 178
  • Chu Canadien Criss!
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2007, 08:23:37 pm »
Ya F12 me like

Offline Vilho

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Scandinavian
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2007, 10:20:19 pm »
...yet more eye delicacies, but why not.

F12.

Offline Ziem

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1007
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2007, 10:27:52 am »
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD

Offline Centurion

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 699
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2007, 11:35:51 am »
F12. I kinde like that.

Offline ghg

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 411
  • Village Idiot
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2007, 07:41:26 am »
F12 cuz it soundz prettiful.
-=Gradius wuz you=-

Offline Magic Odd Effect

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #19 on: January 01, 2008, 05:08:19 pm »
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Like the real AT-4.
Don't say that you're Magic. Because you aren't, and I am.
All-around good with weapons that aren't long range, except in TW.
Now be careful out there, soldier.
Best Newbie in the May 2007 Soldatforums Member Awards!

Offline Centurion

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 699
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #20 on: January 01, 2008, 05:16:48 pm »
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Like the real AT-4.


Not damage. It will kill you! In real life, backblast kills you.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2008, 05:20:48 pm by Centurion »

Offline Eclipse

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 210
  • :D
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #21 on: January 01, 2008, 05:16:53 pm »
F12. Like some RPGs too.
All teh Piezors Shall beh Minezors!

Offline Fluffy

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2008, 02:24:49 am »
The backfire should damage those who are close behind you xD
Like the real AT-4.


Not damage. It will kill you! In real life, backblast kills you.

Perhaps we should make the Minigun's recoil more realistic? Did you also know that a knife throw to the feet is never an instakill in real life? Also the belt of Minimi is quite short... it should be 200 rounds.

Blah blah. Meh.

Long live Nazi-Communism!

Offline Splinter-Snake

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 126
  • One must die, and one must live.
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #23 on: January 02, 2008, 02:36:23 am »
Perhaps we should make the Minigun's recoil more realistic? Did you also know that a knife throw to the feet is never an instakill in real life? Also the belt of Minimi is quite short... it should be 200 rounds.

Blah blah. Meh.

Doesn't this argument against realism ever get old?

Offline JaKe

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 39
  • JaKe-AFC.net
    • AFC
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #24 on: January 02, 2008, 06:34:41 am »
i quote for law backfire!

Offline Lord Frunkamunch

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
  • DRR...DRR...DRR...
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2008, 08:55:38 am »
Doesn't this argument against realism ever get old?

At least he didn't mention jet boots.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.

Offline crazydude360

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 27
Re: Back fire/smoke for law.
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2008, 04:03:22 pm »
yea that back blast would be good for
1. spotting law sprayers
2. getting lucky and toarching that guy that was sneaking up behind u
3. would just look freaking cool!