0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hollywood has a habit of violating the laws of physics. It's impossible for a bullet to decapitate somebody.
Quote from: †on April 14, 2008, 01:25:20 pmTo sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)And we still don't know if dead guys can keep a stiffy.
To sum up my point: We had a multipage debate about toilet padding. (Putting TP in the water so you don't get splashed.)
2) Hollywood has a habit of violating the laws of physics. It's impossible for a bullet to decapitate somebody.
so i'm forsakening asking! what gun is it?
I AM A SMARTARSED PRICK OF A HUMAN BEINGI AM ALSO DOUCHEBAGGERY, AND I'M SPREADING
ty t. i finally know what it could be for the sniper. also, i think it is true about blowing the head and flying away with Barret-like guns. Because my uncle used that once for an experiment, and the Barret's bullet went through the tank! (that's what my uncle told me) and there are also things about the barret talk on my post . Weapon Balance Discussion -> overpowered barret -> then find Pie. he'll have a greyish eye picture. he'll talk about the gun that it's a tank gun. http://forums.soldat.pl/index.php?topic=24161.0 click this to go there and find pie
allows for effective operations against targets like radar cabins, trucks, parked aircraft and so on. The M82 can also be used to defeat human targets from standoff range or when targets are behind cover. However anti-personnel work is not a major application for the M82
so........ it's illegal on warfare also? also, is there any other human using guns that are actually stronger that barret? (NO LAWS AND STUFFS, JUST BULLET GUNS!)
Quote from: tehsnipah on January 30, 2008, 06:27:03 pmso........ it's illegal on warfare also? also, is there any other human using guns that are actually stronger that barret? (NO LAWS AND STUFFS, JUST BULLET GUNS!)To bad there's no rules in war. So no it isn't. And if someobdy asks just say he was wearing body armor, because that counts as equipment.But using anything larger then .50 is kind of a waste on personnel.
Quote from: Dascoo on January 30, 2008, 06:35:22 pmQuote from: tehsnipah on January 30, 2008, 06:27:03 pmso........ it's illegal on warfare also? also, is there any other human using guns that are actually stronger that barret? (NO LAWS AND STUFFS, JUST BULLET GUNS!)To bad there's no rules in war. So no it isn't. And if someobdy asks just say he was wearing body armor, because that counts as equipment.But using anything larger then .50 is kind of a waste on personnel.Well it's kind of illegal, Not to the extent of bum ram in prison, But you are frowned upon because a person has no chance against .50 caliber ammunitions.And it is kind of a waste, I doubt any one soldier is that important to an enemy to break out a .50 cal and nail their arse.