Author Topic: BE updates ? (Read 3278 times)

Leo · « **on:** February 04, 2008, 06:06:04 am »

Last update of my BEServer_x86.so was at 1st Of November 2007. Hackers stopped working ?

echo_trail · « **Reply #1 on:** February 04, 2008, 06:12:49 am »

Hackers stopped working? You mean like the anti hacking module stopped?

blackdevil0742 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 04, 2008, 06:20:19 am »

I think he meant that it has been a while since BE was updated. I have seen hackers so...

echo_trail · « **Reply #3 on:** February 04, 2008, 06:28:35 am »

Oh... right. Obviously..

Leo · « **Reply #4 on:** February 04, 2008, 07:06:44 am »

Yes, I have seen hackers again after long time plus no BE updates. That's why the question above...

Radical Terrorist · « **Reply #5 on:** February 04, 2008, 07:24:04 am »

I haven't seen any yet, but I guess it's expected of the buggers to start trying once the updates stop.

$able · « **Reply #6 on:** February 04, 2008, 10:45:41 am »

1.) The dlls not always need to be updated necessarily to detect new stuff.

2.) I try my best, but I can't guarantee that all private hacks (with BE bypasses) are detected.

3.) Please keep in mind that I am doing this in my free time. I am not paid to support Soldat, so please be content with what you have.

Leo · « **Reply #7 on:** February 04, 2008, 11:36:58 am »

1. I didn't know that
2. Yes I know this
3. Of course, I never said you are not doing a good job

Radical Terrorist · « **Reply #8 on:** February 04, 2008, 12:15:16 pm »

I'm just glad that sable made BE in the first place, updated or not. I haven't seen a single hacker since it was added, but in 1.3.1 They were everywhere.

blackdevil0742 · « **Reply #9 on:** February 04, 2008, 01:44:31 pm »

Yes yes. I didn't mean anything bad about my previous comment(just pointing out now that hackers seem to appear). I appreciate all the work you've put into BE to let us play without any baddies.

El_Spec · « **Reply #10 on:** February 04, 2008, 03:09:56 pm »

I've never seen it do its job.Â It always used to kick innocent players.Â Now it seems to be fixed and kick/ban the right people.Â Despite it having to slow down games and cause other problems, its still good to have it.

Radical Terrorist · « **Reply #11 on:** February 04, 2008, 03:42:28 pm »

Soldat used to be a hacker's paradise. Now the odd tard that gets through is quickly kicked by other players or admin.

$able · « **Reply #12 on:** February 04, 2008, 05:21:32 pm »

Quote from: El_Spec on February 04, 2008, 03:09:56 pm

I've never seen it do its job. It always used to kick innocent players. Now it seems to be fixed and kick/ban the right people. Despite it having to slow down games and cause other problems, its still good to have it.

That is your perception. Nothing really changed, maybe there are also less people around applying an old BE update when they shouldn't?
And you are the first one in a while to say it slows down the game. Actually it shouldn't. If it causes problems for you, please report them.

And yes, I am tired of unfounded flaming - I am not saying you are flaming here though.

On a side note, if you really want to get rid of private hacks, just buy them and send me. If you feel the need to support BE at any time...

mar77a · « **Reply #13 on:** February 04, 2008, 05:27:26 pm »

The whole BE Disconnect vs. Soldat disconnect is probably what makes BE "look bad" (not that I care, BE rocks imo). Just remember "BE: client not responding" is most likely the user d/c without notifying the server (The good old "<player> has disconnected" that still pop ups every now and then).

Keep it up $able.

$able · « **Reply #14 on:** February 04, 2008, 05:33:52 pm »

mar77a, I know what you mean, but the disconnect notification is fine (even without the rare disconnect message).
Actually "Client not responding" can only happen if the game crashed.

El_Spec · « **Reply #15 on:** February 04, 2008, 08:55:16 pm »

I completely support BattlEye $able and have nothing against it. I'm was just making a statement that even though it has its share of problems, it is still good to have it around.

I don't think BattlEye has all the blame for slowing down Soldat, FliesLikeABrick and others did state that there may be a possibility that a bug exists and causes Soldat to slow down in certain situations. This problem had became so severe, I could barely run 1.4, I instead played 1.2.1. Recently it seems to have been fixed and I'm able to play the current version with minimal problems.

Radical Terrorist · « **Reply #16 on:** February 04, 2008, 08:58:00 pm »

I've never run into a framerate problem with soldat except for when I hit a lava poly, in which case I see every 10 frames and have to self kill to end it.

And about BE causing problems, name one anti-cheat software that has never caused anyone any trouble. They all have their flaws, but I think so far BE has done better than most AC engines for blocking out the Socially depraved kiddies that feel the need to hack.

El_Spec · « **Reply #17 on:** February 04, 2008, 09:26:44 pm »

The lava-polygon is a confirmed bug and I'm hoping it'll be fixed.Â Many have complained it causes heavy lagging in servers and affects everyone.

PunkBuster is fairly stable, never has caused me a problem.Â But its just popular, and it doesn't mean its the best anti-cheat solution.Â Most of the problems with BattlEye are mainly caused because my system is equivalent to the minimal requirements for Soldat to run.Â I've ran Soldat on newer machines with no problems.

Radical Terrorist · « **Reply #18 on:** February 04, 2008, 09:31:46 pm »

Punkbuster has the occasional client error, and it is a twat of a thing if your CVARs are out of whack on quake-engine games.

Boots · « **Reply #19 on:** February 04, 2008, 10:50:09 pm »

I can't wait for a update.. Theres been a new hacking "clan" around aussie servers, Disconecting servers, impersinating admins.. And now its got to the point if GA gameops ban them, they will d/c GA servers.

Good luck on improving BE.

News:

Author Topic: BE updates ? (Read 3278 times)

El_Spec

El_Spec

El_Spec