Author Topic: NAN0 v2.1 [REG] (Read 28118 times)

Espadon · « **Reply #20 on:** March 10, 2008, 04:13:18 pm »

Nope. The votes have spoken. 640x480 is the way to go.

Laser Guy · « **Reply #21 on:** March 10, 2008, 04:29:42 pm »

Quote from: Espadon on March 10, 2008, 04:13:18 pm

Nope. The votes have spoken. 640x480 is the way to go.

Can't u at least make one for every possible resolution and the rest for 640x480?

Espadon · « **Reply #22 on:** March 10, 2008, 04:30:36 pm »

Oh, you guys are really sobbing for this one aren't you?

Biscuiteer · « **Reply #23 on:** March 10, 2008, 05:40:07 pm »

Solid work, indeed.

How can this get even better? (Don't say make this for more resolutions...)

Laser Guy · « **Reply #24 on:** March 10, 2008, 05:44:04 pm »

Quote from: Espadon on March 10, 2008, 04:30:36 pm

Oh, you guys are really sobbing for this one aren't you?

Of course I am...

Biscuiteer · « **Reply #25 on:** March 10, 2008, 06:51:09 pm »

Espadon has uploaded a quick fix for those of you who downloaded the Patch version. Minor fixes, and re-aligns the flag indicators.

Now download it and get goin'!

Omicron · « **Reply #26 on:** March 27, 2008, 10:11:20 pm »

Quote from: Thinkto urself on March 10, 2008, 04:11:41 pm

There never will be a 800x600 version of your interfaces, will there?

Or a 1024 x 768

Arbiter · « **Reply #27 on:** March 28, 2008, 08:39:15 am »

Espadon's 0-series for default-included custom interfaces. Without the advertising, of course.

Who's going to second this? (If Enesce's gang ever look here.)

det · « **Reply #28 on:** March 28, 2008, 03:07:31 pm »

I found one bug in # NAN0 v2.1 #
when i changing something with interface maker - granades was not shown in one line, they lay down one on other.
why?
did somebody knows another interface maker?

Espadon · « **Reply #29 on:** March 28, 2008, 06:04:45 pm »

Yep, if you don't know what you're doing, trying to feck with my interfaces will mess them up. Nice try.

Laser Guy · « **Reply #30 on:** March 28, 2008, 06:20:45 pm »

Quote from: Espadon on March 28, 2008, 06:04:45 pm

Yep, if you don't know what you're doing, trying to feck with my interfaces will mess them up. Nice try.

I won't fuck with it f u make 1024x768 one.

M.rSnow · « **Reply #31 on:** March 30, 2008, 04:32:10 pm »

I migth consider registering just because of this.... Nah.

det · « **Reply #32 on:** April 02, 2008, 11:56:57 am »

Espadon
How i can edit elements position without this bug?

Espadon · « **Reply #33 on:** April 02, 2008, 03:57:03 pm »

Make your own.

det · « **Reply #34 on:** April 03, 2008, 09:36:59 am »

This is not answer.
You know, your interface is very popular, and you can not give fans what they want?

Espadon · « **Reply #35 on:** May 17, 2008, 04:22:37 pm »

I'm far too busy to bother with this stuff anymore, and I could care less about how many fans I get for my interface. *shrug*

If you want to hijack my stuff, at least you can do me a favor and not tell me about it. If anyone else wants to explain the process of editing PNG interfaces, go ahead.

Date Posted: April 03, 2008, 04:45:55 pm

Possibly good news for you lamers! I was, ah, thinking about knocking up NAN0 for 1024 x 768. Don't get your hopes up too soon though, since I need to decide first whether I want the teeny bars or the full-sized bars for it and, ah... hrm... ahhhhhh... mmmhmm.

Hrrrm. Bump.

MY_FIREMAN_IS_HUGE · « **Reply #36 on:** May 17, 2008, 10:44:48 pm »

No!!! Your interfaces are hawt... why

!

Biggles · « **Reply #37 on:** May 18, 2008, 09:35:39 am »

amazing interface

Cold Hand · « **Reply #38 on:** May 28, 2008, 07:01:26 am »

I loved your interfaces until i realised that you went ego by putting your name in it.

Ruins interfaces that i find even beautiful.

Biscuiteer · « **Reply #39 on:** May 28, 2008, 01:46:42 pm »

Blah, its a minor nuisance. If you find it distracting then get another interface, because nobody said you have to use this one.

News:

Poll

Your favorite 0-series interface?

Author Topic: NAN0 v2.1 [REG] (Read 28118 times)