Author Topic: Why was 1.2.1 good?  (Read 6348 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline InoX

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 30
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #40 on: May 08, 2008, 11:50:23 am »
Umm,maybe when barret had no delay.it owned cuz i love camping ;D
yes, it owned, it was really really easy to use:( even more than today!

Offline STM1993

  • Rainbow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 2072
  • It's been a long time.
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #41 on: May 08, 2008, 11:53:00 am »
Barett was easy to use due to a lack of startup time, but the problem is that makes the Barrett overpowered and overused. Besides, with the startup time, it is still relatively easy to use.

Offline ViN

  • Camper
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • Try, Fail, Repeat.
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #42 on: May 08, 2008, 12:55:19 pm »
No movement acc, that was it.
It was fun to play with ruger and barrett until 1.4.

Geekier than you!

Offline theSTATWHORE

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 35
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #43 on: May 08, 2008, 01:50:00 pm »
Overall the community was much better and game play seems like it was more fun. Also, no whining :*(

Offline a-4-year-old

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #44 on: May 08, 2008, 01:59:28 pm »
No movement acc, that was it.
It was fun to play with ruger and barrett until 1.4.
Good answer.
If we hit the bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. -Zapp Brannigan

Offline 8th_account

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 237
  • Munitions Support
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #45 on: May 09, 2008, 07:37:11 pm »
No movement acc, that was it.
It was fun to play with ruger and barrett until 1.4.
There were no moveacc changes between 1.2.1 and 1.3.1. And in 1.4, barret's moveacc was only changed from 6 to 7 while ruger's remained unchanged.


Going by game pace I'd say 1.1.X were way faster. Without the ability to jump backwards, prone and backflip there was no other way to play the game than to attack.

1.2.1 was pure shit in clanwars. If you wanted to win you had to use either Ak, deagles or barret. I've never prayed so much for a new WM as I did for 1.3, unknowing that it would be just as bad.

Offline JesusEatsBanana

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 33
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #46 on: May 09, 2008, 11:43:33 pm »
1.2.1 wasnt that good. Even thought not many people hacked it back then, it was way to easy to hack. Now its the opposite, lots of hackers, harder to hack.
Please read the rules for signature size.

ZOMG!! I d0zent needz a s1g w3n 1 h4z h4x!!!

Offline BondJamesBond

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
    • http://tobylands.com
Re: Why was 1.2.1 good?
« Reply #47 on: May 10, 2008, 12:25:02 am »
.... what the feck
 Tbh, I have seen one hacker in the last three months, I think.
The computer is a moron.
?  - Peter Drucker