Author Topic: Axiomatic?  (Read 2934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Axiomatic?
« on: June 15, 2008, 01:20:18 pm »
Are questions, by themselves, axiomatic?

Offline {LAW} Gamer_2k4

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • To Wikipedia!
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2008, 01:34:19 pm »
If they were, they'd be unnecessary, right?
Gamer_2k4

Only anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.
so clearly jgrp is a goddamn anime connoisseur. his opinion might as well be law here.

Best Admin: jrgp, he's like the forum mom and a pet dog rolled into one.

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2008, 01:35:36 pm »
If they were, they'd be unnecessary, right?

How so?

Offline {LAW} Gamer_2k4

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • To Wikipedia!
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2008, 01:42:35 pm »
Well, axiomatic means undeniably true, right? If something is undeniably true, there's no need to question it.  Therefore, if questions are to have a purpose, they must not be self-evident, and therefore cannot be axiomatic.
Gamer_2k4

Only anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.
so clearly jgrp is a goddamn anime connoisseur. his opinion might as well be law here.

Best Admin: jrgp, he's like the forum mom and a pet dog rolled into one.

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2008, 01:43:35 pm »
Well, axiomatic means undeniably true, right? If something is undeniably true, there's no need to question it.  Therefore, if questions are to have a purpose, they must not be self-evident, and therefore cannot be axiomatic.

Its more, self-evident I'd say.

Axioms have a purpose.

Offline a-4-year-old

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2008, 01:54:59 pm »
you know its a good topic when you have to wiki something.


I still don't understand the question.
If we hit the bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. -Zapp Brannigan

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2008, 01:56:35 pm »
Are the nature of questions axiomatic?

Offline Demonic

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
  • All you hate!
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2008, 03:15:11 pm »
Except for the question-phrase itself, I guess they are.

The question 'How are you' implies takes the fact that you are as an axiom, and simply questions it.

Other than that, no fucking clue.

Offline a-4-year-old

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2008, 03:18:17 pm »
Do you mean the question itself or its answer or the reasoning behind asking a question?
If we hit the bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. -Zapp Brannigan

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2008, 03:35:21 pm »
Do you mean the question itself or its answer or the reasoning behind asking a question?


I mean, is the nature of "question" axiomatic?

Offline chutem

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1119
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2008, 04:26:09 am »
 ???
1NK3FbdNtH6jNH4dc1fzuvd4ruVdMQABvs

Offline Pie

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2008, 04:39:27 am »
Do you mean the question itself or its answer or the reasoning behind asking a question?


I mean, is the nature of "question" axiomatic?
Because by constantly repeating yourself, i'm sure they will get it.

Rephrase the question if you want some really coherent answers...
Lol, internets.

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2008, 07:39:59 am »
IS the nature or what a question is, lend itself to giving self-evident ideas?

Offline Mangled*

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
  • Never Wrong
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2008, 05:30:45 pm »
I can tell you've just learned this word.

We can all tell.

Feel ashamed.
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses." - Ezekiel 23:20

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2008, 05:31:15 pm »
I can tell you've just learned this word.

We can all tell.

Feel ashamed.

Are you sure about this?

Offline Mangled*

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
  • Never Wrong
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2008, 05:35:29 pm »
Yes.

Aren't you?
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses." - Ezekiel 23:20

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2008, 05:36:45 pm »

Offline Mangled*

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
  • Never Wrong
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #17 on: June 17, 2008, 05:53:35 pm »
I think that you have very recently come across this word and so looked up its meaning.

I don't think anybody that was well acquainted with this word would bother to make a topic sheerly based on the meaning of it even if they wanted to give themselves some sort of online ego-boost.

This thread is the equivalent of "I learned a new word, lets talk about it!".
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses." - Ezekiel 23:20

Offline Smegma

  • Inactive Staff
  • Soldier
  • *****
  • Posts: 131
  • That's just a way to break a unity
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #18 on: June 17, 2008, 05:54:37 pm »
I think that you have very recently come across this word and so looked up its meaning.

I don't think anybody that was well acquainted with this word would bother to make a topic sheerly based on the meaning of it even if they wanted to give themselves some sort of online ego-boost.

This thread is the equivalent of "I learned a new word, lets talk about it!".

The topic is not about the word. Its not about the meaning of the word axiomatic, its about the nature of questioning.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2008, 05:56:19 pm by Smegma »

Offline Mangled*

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
  • Never Wrong
Re: Axiomatic?
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2008, 05:58:18 pm »
The topic requires that people know what the word means as it's directly posed as part of the question that the topic is for. Also the word is the topic title.

The topic is about the word regardless of however much you wish to deny that.

Nice little edit there by the way.
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses." - Ezekiel 23:20