Author Topic: A little test..  (Read 1655 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline homey188

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 128
    • A good roleplay site
A little test..
« on: July 17, 2006, 05:59:57 pm »


Offline Mistercharles

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1371
  • +
Re: A little test..
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2006, 09:30:57 pm »
Gah, don't use JPEG. Use PNG.
shoutout to m'boyz eagles_arrows, echo_trail, wraithlike, sadistatheart, chakapoko maker, jrgp, aznblood, chakra, keron cyst, et al, miss you, let's '#gather some day

Offline Zazikerng

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 28
  • Banned
Re: A little test..
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2006, 02:32:33 am »
Better yet, use quality 10 JPEG.


<m00`> i fucken told the fucken truth and you fuckendeleted it fuck you
<m00`> FUCK YOU CHAKRA

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: A little test..
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2006, 06:12:07 am »
looks much better as PNG now

zazikerng, there is no "qulity 10 jpeg" when he is saving directly from pain.

Offline Zazikerng

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 28
  • Banned
Re: A little test..
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2006, 08:31:32 am »
looks much better as PNG now

zazikerng, there is no "qulity 10 jpeg" when he is saving directly from pain.

Yes, I know. I was just saying how quality 10 JPEG is the superior image format to use.


<m00`> i fucken told the fucken truth and you fuckendeleted it fuck you
<m00`> FUCK YOU CHAKRA

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: A little test..
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2006, 08:37:24 am »
why would it be superior to png?  the png file is tiny compared to how large the jpeg would be

Offline frogboy

  • Soldier
  • **
  • Posts: 107
Re: A little test..
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2006, 02:43:07 am »
Quality 10 JPEG would probably be quite small... it's lower quality, that's why he said it.

Offline Zazikerng

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 28
  • Banned
Re: A little test..
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2006, 12:53:03 am »
Quality 10 JPEG would probably be quite small... it's lower quality, that's why he said it.

Also, it looks like shit and is fun to use in mocking images!


<m00`> i fucken told the fucken truth and you fuckendeleted it fuck you
<m00`> FUCK YOU CHAKRA

Offline FliesLikeABrick

  • Administrator
  • Flamebow Warrior
  • *****
  • Posts: 6144
    • Ultimate 13 Soldat
Re: A little test..
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2006, 07:37:03 am »
Quality 10 JPEG would probably be quite small... it's lower quality, that's why he said it.

hm, maybe we're talking about different programs.  I figured he was talking about photoshop, where the default quality range goes up to 12, 12 being the best quality (and a huge image).

I'm guessing, based on what frogboy said, that you're talking about quality 10 as in 10% quality (a program which bases the quality on a percent 1-100)

perhaps saying 10% would have avoided the confusion? :P

Offline Zazikerng

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 28
  • Banned
Re: A little test..
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2006, 07:46:07 am »
Maybe it would, or maybe THIS WAS MY PLAN ALL ALONG.


<m00`> i fucken told the fucken truth and you fuckendeleted it fuck you
<m00`> FUCK YOU CHAKRA