Author Topic: Win/Fail? (Read 27654 times)

Espadon · « **Reply #60 on:** September 15, 2008, 05:20:19 pm »

Quote from: Hair|Trigger on September 15, 2008, 01:32:09 am

I love the details if only you didn't just sketch everything =(

You give it a try then ^^

shantec · « **Reply #61 on:** September 16, 2008, 02:16:16 pm »

Lol Espadon, im pretty slow, but now i finally got it...

You are a fucking great artn00bomfgr0lfc0pt3r!!
AWSUMMMMMM

Boots · « **Reply #62 on:** September 16, 2008, 09:42:04 pm »

Quote from: Hair|Trigger on September 15, 2008, 01:32:09 am

I love the details if only you didn't just sketch everything =(

rofl, sketchin' is the easiest way to draw things. Go back to paint nab

Espadon · « **Reply #63 on:** September 25, 2008, 06:08:45 pm »

Sharpie/Brush marker linework, colored in PS.

LtKillroy · « **Reply #64 on:** September 25, 2008, 06:11:27 pm »

This is a school comic? That makes it funnier than it actually is. Nice. Not half bad by the way. Is the blue bunny doing the pink bunny in the third scene?

N0va · « **Reply #65 on:** September 25, 2008, 06:18:24 pm »

nice lol

Hair|Trigger · « **Reply #66 on:** September 25, 2008, 11:43:49 pm »

HAHAHAHA nice 3rd square =D

Espadon · « **Reply #67 on:** October 02, 2008, 09:46:37 pm »

Trying out Artgerm's multiply overlay linework method.. Works REALLY well. Can't believe I didn't figure it out earlier >.<

iDante · « **Reply #68 on:** October 02, 2008, 11:17:13 pm »

Quote from: Espadon on October 02, 2008, 09:46:37 pm

Trying out Artgerm's multiply overlay linework method.. Works REALLY well. Can't believe I didn't figure it out earlier >.<

link/explain?

Espadon · « **Reply #69 on:** October 03, 2008, 08:11:14 pm »

Put linework on layer set to multiply and paint under that layer. Multiply allows for opaque linework layers to act transparent. Multiply seems to assign black to 0 and white to 1 and then calculate white content versus black content when it filters the layers below. Black[0]xValueUnderneath[X] = 0, which equals black, so the linework on top remains. However, White[1]xValueUnderneath[X] = Value[X] so the white in the layer is as good as tranparent.

Hair|Trigger · « **Reply #70 on:** October 03, 2008, 08:19:09 pm »

lolwhut

I fail to see how it's different from your other pics, in fact, I think it's worse in that you have so many scribbles and stuff everywhere >_>

Not that I know anything about this but i rly dnt lyk it tht mch

Espadon · « **Reply #71 on:** October 03, 2008, 08:27:28 pm »

You ought to stick with photography, son.

The main things though is that you can use that so to paint under linework even if it's an opaque layer [so you don't have to go through color->alpha which can be a bit restrictive at times]. It's just a faster method I guess, haha.

Blue-ninja · « **Reply #72 on:** October 03, 2008, 08:43:00 pm »

Does this apply to GIMP? :/

Espadon · « **Reply #73 on:** October 15, 2008, 08:37:01 pm »

It should. Layer blending types should be the same for both programs. I know GIMP also groups layer blending styles by family so if it's not named multiply [highly doubt it] an equivalent should be near types like color burn.

Date Posted: October 03, 2008, 09:50:20 pm

Again [haven't worked on it in a while thanks to Diablo 2].

Which one is moar win =.=

Blue-ninja · « **Reply #74 on:** October 15, 2008, 08:43:41 pm »

The white ninja is win.

The Goliad · « **Reply #75 on:** October 18, 2008, 02:12:38 am »

You are truly gifted, Espadon, but I really do not get this.

Laser Guy · « **Reply #76 on:** October 18, 2008, 05:07:59 am »

Damn, I'm in love...
VGJ Espadon

Wolf_Man · « **Reply #77 on:** October 18, 2008, 11:20:48 am »

I like the cloaked one.

Espadon · « **Reply #78 on:** October 18, 2008, 10:08:52 pm »

Hair|Trigger · « **Reply #79 on:** October 18, 2008, 10:46:30 pm »

I like

much better

News:

Author Topic: Win/Fail? (Read 27654 times)