0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
And as the lyrics go in the United State's national anthem: "America, f**k YEAH!".
Go prone and jet while in air...
Quote from: miketh2005 on July 10, 2009, 07:31:20 pmDonate to enesceHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Donate to enesce
Leave these big multiplayer gameplay ideas out of Soldat. Soldat has it's own style, so if you don't like it, go play something else.
I attend grammar school, last grade, and ignorance is all around me. Well, good for them. Ignorance is bliss.
Quote from: SpiltCoffee on August 24, 2008, 08:07:33 amLeave these big multiplayer gameplay ideas out of Soldat. Soldat has it's own style, so if you don't like it, go play something else.Why is it every time anyone suggests something, there's always at least one person convinced it'll ruin the very idea of Soldat and it's simplicity? Soldat has had big changes before. People have bltched over every single one of them, but I doubt those people would want to go back to the original. MINOR CHANGES LIKE THIS WILL NOT RUIN GAMEPLAY. "SIMPLICITY" IS NOT A FRAGILE IDEA ON THE BRINK OF DESTRUCTION. IF YOU OPPOSE AN IDEA GIVE A LEGITIMATE REASON, NOT THIS BULLSH!T COP OUT.Thanks, and feck you and everyone who has ever said this without a supporting reason.Personally, I think this would work out with the COD4 system of not being able to shoot while sprinting. Possibly borrowing the stamina recharge time as well.
Quote from: SpiltCoffee on August 24, 2008, 08:07:33 amLeave these big multiplayer gameplay ideas out of Soldat. Soldat has it's own style, so if you don't like it, go play something else.Why is it every time anyone suggests something, there's always at least one person convinced it'll ruin the very idea of Soldat and it's simplicity? Soldat has had big changes before. People have bltched over every single one of them, but I doubt those people would want to go back to the original.MINOR CHANGES LIKE THIS WILL NOT RUIN GAMEPLAY. "SIMPLICITY" IS NOT A FRAGILE IDEA ON THE BRINK OF DESTRUCTION. IF YOU OPPOSE AN IDEA GIVE A LEGITIMATE REASON, NOT THIS BULLSH!T COP OUT.Thanks, and feck you and everyone who has ever said this without a supporting reason.Personally, I think this would work out with the COD4 system of not being able to shoot while sprinting. Possibly borrowing the stamina recharge time as well.
Well this isn't "a minor change" It is a big one, why? Because it will make it so 1) You can cap faster 2) Get to the person you want to kill faster 3) Just generally go faster 4) In the next versions momentum is added to bullet range(I think atleast)
This would change the gameplay way more than a "minor change" It would probably render the current smaller maps useless because of how fast you would be able to move through them.
About adding stamina: It would break all the current interfaces because they do not have a bar for it meaning everyone would have to change them(well not break them but you get what i mean =/).
Making it so you can't shoot while running is a good idea..but still all the person would have to do is stop holding shift(while the momentum keeps them going) and shoot you then continue running.
Soldat is already a fast paced game...why make it faster so you can cap or kill 1 second faster?
Why is it every time anyone suggests something, there's always at least one person convinced it'll ruin the very idea of Soldat and it's simplicity? Soldat has had big changes before. People have bltched over every single one of them, but I doubt those people would want to go back to the original. MINOR CHANGES LIKE THIS WILL NOT RUIN GAMEPLAY. "SIMPLICITY" IS NOT A FRAGILE IDEA ON THE BRINK OF DESTRUCTION. IF YOU OPPOSE AN IDEA GIVE A LEGITIMATE REASON, NOT THIS BULLSH!T COP OUT.Thanks, and feck you and everyone who has ever said this without a supporting reason.Personally, I think this would work out with the COD4 system of not being able to shoot while sprinting. Possibly borrowing the stamina recharge time as well.