Obama's inauguration.

[FliesLikeABrick]

Do you have a source for this, let alone a lot of the other crap you're referring to?

Yes, I, do, ... it was even on CNN and BBC the other day. TV that is.
i'm not even going to bother with the "other crap". you'll have to trust me for not wanting to (biasly) derail or demonise an already elected president.

So uh... where is the authoritative source (the CNN and BBC ones you mention) in there that says Obama is trying to repeal the ammendment?  Where is a source that isn't a blog and indicates Obama's intent to stay in office, as you indicated in your original post (not that the blog indicates it either)?

edit: I see that ElephantHunter beat me to the punch, he says it much better than I do.

[Xxypher]

We would have the American dolar, which would most likely fluxuate tenfold compared to now.

[Slashnoob]

Those "sources" are a load of bull. Just reading them makes me ill. You're an idiot and conspiracy theorist.

wow, offended much? i know he himself didn't present the bill that suggests that idea, but i've seen an interview in television that he supports this idea and will try to thrust it further. another interview has shown he said something about being the presidnet for the next eight to ten years. i can't seem to find it on CNN.com and this is definately not something i'd dig up the internet for.

also, israel having the most number of nukes? they barely have 200, and some of these are strategic nuclear warheads only.

[Sir Jeremy]

China currently has the most active troops, even if they might not be as good as the USA, it's not too hard to fire a machine gun.

So you admit that you were lying when you said "China has 200 million troops"?

Israel they are uncertain to how many they have, maybe they have alot more than you think, or less. (who knowns)

So you admit that you were simply spouting bulls**t when you said "Israel has the most active nukes"?

But, more about this Amero thing, who thinks something like this might become possible in the near future? Do you think this is what Obama tends to do to help the economy?

Obama has not expressed any interest in the Amero. I doubt it will happen in the near future.
 

Your link proves nothing if you can't gimmi the exact data of how much a soldier or a nuke you can sell for.(to repay the dept)

My link proves that China doesn't have 200* million troops and that Israel does not have the most active nuclear weapons.

No, I'm sure China can amass a troop of 200million..

Also, Obama just become president, give it a while.  If he says he is going to try to fix the economy, how do you think he is going to do it?

[Dascoo]

No, I'm sure China can amass a troop of 200million..

Yeah equipping 200 million people is a synch

To bad it's not possible. What kind of imaginary world do you live in?

[kingkitty]

Also, Obama just become president, give it a while.  If he says he is going to try to fix the economy, how do you think he is going to do it?

From what I'm hearing he's trying to gain support for a large stimulus package. But we'll see if that helps the economy.

And no I don't think he'll even consider the Amero route.

[a-4-year-old]

they can't feed a couple thousand babies without poisoning them, what makes you think they can train an army?

[LtKillroy]

I honestly thought the Inaguration was boring and Obama himself unchacteristically prayed and quoted scripture a lot. Some of the gallas afterword were pretty interesting though. And it made for some really really great taken out of context clips. (This is taken from Al Gore's Green Ball, etc.)

[Sir Jeremy]

No, I'm sure China can amass a troop of 200million..

Yeah equipping 200 million people is a synch

To bad it's not possible. What kind of imaginary world do you live in?

Sorry, this is just what I heard.  I'm gonna go see if I can find any proof to support this theory.

* Sir Jeremy lives in Jeremy's world

[excruciator]

I never said that number was the only factor that helped them to win the war. But it's importance it's undeniable.

in other words you're backpedalling from "they won because of numbers" to the obvious "bigger armies have a slightly better chance of winning"

In other words what??
I hope you realize that the outcome of an war is multi-factorial. Each factor is just as important as the other.
Number won them the war, Tactics won them the war and good command also won them the same war. The statement still hold true regardless how many factors there are.

Not backpedaling anything.

Also, I never said that they "won only because of numbers". That's your own implication it, needless to say, its wrong.

Last point. Yes, soviet send wave after wave of troops. So what? It won them the war! Like Stalin once said, Quantity has a quality all its own. You just can't deny that.

No it didn't. It cost the soviets tens of millions of lives, and when they were using large waves of people to assault a position it was during the early half of the war. You know, where they were on the defensive and getting there ass severely kicked.

I'm going to answer this with my quote that you quoted above. To indicate how pointless this statement is.

...Yes, soviet send wave after wave of troops. So what? It won them the war!

they can't feed a couple thousand babies without poisoning them, what makes you think they can train an army?

Because they are not training an army of babies you dummy.

[Dascoo]

The soviets won the war not by throwing bodies at the german's, but by using superior artillery and infiltration tactics. Except in movies you only see soviets using human wave tactics, all western propaganda to hide the fact that they were defeated by an actually well trained, well equipped, and extremely tough army. The whole "1 MAN WITH GUN, 1 MAN WITH BULLET" is a load of bulls**t.

Then again, LIKE I SAID BEFORE, the German's were being bombed to s**t, so to be honest Strategic bombing won the war, not human waves.

So the west bought the belief that they were defeated by the Untermensch hordes. Unlike Hitler, Stalin learned from his mistakes.

[a-4-year-old]

The soviets won the war not by throwing bodies at the german's, but by using superior artillery and infiltration tactics. Except in movies you only see soviets using human wave tactics, all german propaganda to hide the fact that they were defeated by an actually well trained, and extremely tough army.

thats a good one, now let me try..

JFK was actually attacked by a laser from a satellite from space

[The Geologist]

they can't feed a couple thousand babies without poisoning them, what makes you think they can train an army?

If you're referring to the milk scandal, the company involved was basically shut down and two men were sentenced to death for it.

[Dascoo]

The soviets won the war not by throwing bodies at the german's, but by using superior artillery and infiltration tactics. Except in movies you only see soviets using human wave tactics, all german propaganda to hide the fact that they were defeated by an actually well trained, and extremely tough army.

thats a good one, now let me try..

JFK was actually attacked by a laser from a satellite from space

Debunk me.

[a-4-year-old]

Way more communists were killed than germans.

[Dascoo]

German's were extremely brutal towards anyone slavic, soldier or civilian. Villages were burnt down, and people massacred. This was encouraged.

The beginning half of the war saw the use of human waves by the soviets, but that wasn't winning the war, that was losing it.

A large majority of the holocaust took place in Eastern Europe. The large loss of life occured when the Soviets were on the defensive.

[a-4-year-old]

the soviets always draw the army deep within russia until their supply lines are stretched then the russian winter wins them the war. They've been doing that since Napoleonic wars. Germany just made a series of huge mistakes in tactics which lost them the war.

[Dascoo]

Stating the obvious. The German's actually expected more resistance from the soviets, but instead they got backward dirt roads, and everyone f**king retreating.

EDIT: Actually fuck that. Deleted

[tehsnipah]

they can't feed a couple thousand babies without poisoning them, what makes you think they can train an army?

If you're referring to the milk scandal, the company involved was basically shut down and two men were sentenced to death for it.

Damn I'm out of the social life.. I never knew.
Anyways, Obama still has three months of "Initiation", right?

[Chariot]

yeah, it takes awhile to haze the president and teach him all the secret passwords and even the secret handshake!!

what the hell are they teaching you in school