Author Topic: Official Religious Debate Thread (Read 81058 times)

GSx_Major · « **Reply #220 on:** March 14, 2009, 08:24:46 pm »

I'm just curious in religion, its followers and their view on it.

AntiHero · « **Reply #221 on:** March 14, 2009, 09:14:04 pm »

What dose the Easter egg bunny and us coloring eggs have to do the rising of Jesus Christ? I just see a huge gap that Wata effing dose a bunny have to do with Jesus and hiding eggs :O

Smegma · « **Reply #222 on:** March 14, 2009, 10:29:22 pm »

Quote

Since when God is everything?

For a while now.

excruciator · « **Reply #223 on:** March 15, 2009, 08:02:42 am »

Quote from: Smegma on March 14, 2009, 10:29:22 pm

Quote
Since when God is everything?

For a while now.

Really? I didn't know that I was breathing the Lord, eating the Lord and stomping on the Lord everytime I move.

{LAW} Gamer_2k4 · « **Reply #224 on:** March 15, 2009, 10:57:16 am »

Quote from: excruciator on March 15, 2009, 08:02:42 am

Quote from: Smegma on March 14, 2009, 10:29:22 pm
Quote
Since when God is everything?

For a while now.
Really? I didn't know that I was breathing the Lord, eating the Lord and stomping on the Lord everytime I move.

Well, it's somewhat dependent on your definition of "God." Not everyone thinks that God is some big omnipotent being up in the sky.

Twistkill · « **Reply #225 on:** March 16, 2009, 03:17:47 pm »

Quote from: AntiHero on March 14, 2009, 09:14:04 pm

What dose the Easter egg bunny and us coloring eggs have to do the rising of Jesus Christ? I just see a huge gap that Wata effing dose a bunny have to do with Jesus and hiding eggs :O

Yeah, we actually don't know either. That stupid bunny and his eggs have nothing to do with the death/resurrection of Jesus.

{LAW} Gamer_2k4 · « **Reply #226 on:** March 16, 2009, 07:59:09 pm »

Quote from: Twistkill on March 16, 2009, 03:17:47 pm

Quote from: AntiHero on March 14, 2009, 09:14:04 pm
What dose the Easter egg bunny and us coloring eggs have to do the rising of Jesus Christ? I just see a huge gap that Wata effing dose a bunny have to do with Jesus and hiding eggs :O
Yeah, we actually don't know either. That stupid bunny and his eggs have nothing to do with the death/resurrection of Jesus.

South Park has a pretty decent explanation:
http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103208/

GSx_Major · « **Reply #227 on:** March 16, 2009, 08:18:08 pm »

Quote from: AntiHero on March 14, 2009, 09:14:04 pm

What dose the Easter egg bunny and us coloring eggs have to do the rising of Jesus Christ? I just see a huge gap that Wata effing dose a bunny have to do with Jesus and hiding eggs :O

It doesn't have anything to do with it...

excruciator · « **Reply #228 on:** March 16, 2009, 09:27:15 pm »

Quote from: GSx_Major on March 16, 2009, 08:18:08 pm

Quote from: AntiHero on March 14, 2009, 09:14:04 pm
What dose the Easter egg bunny and us coloring eggs have to do the rising of Jesus Christ? I just see a huge gap that Wata effing dose a bunny have to do with Jesus and hiding eggs :O
It doesn't have anything to do with it...

Has religion ever MADE sense?

STM1993 · « **Reply #229 on:** March 16, 2009, 11:06:47 pm »

http://www.youtube.com/user/VenomFangX
^ Watch this guy's videos, he has very good arguments regarding religion. (He's a Christian)

iDante · « **Reply #230 on:** March 16, 2009, 11:45:48 pm »

Quote from: STM1993 on March 16, 2009, 11:06:47 pm

http://www.youtube.com/user/VenomFangX
^ Watch this guy's videos, he has very good arguments regarding religion. (He's a Christian)

He also has a fundamental misunderstanding with how just about everything works. Of all his stuff I could only find one example of him discussion evolution, and that was a 45 second video discussing Darwin's "stupid theory."

Smegma · « **Reply #231 on:** March 17, 2009, 12:09:54 am »

Quote from: excruciator on March 15, 2009, 08:02:42 am

Quote from: Smegma on March 14, 2009, 10:29:22 pm
Quote
Since when God is everything?

For a while now.
Really? I didn't know that I was breathing the Lord, eating the Lord and stomping on the Lord everytime I move.

The lord is doing this to himself.

N. Escalona · « **Reply #232 on:** March 17, 2009, 12:11:59 am »

Eh... I don't pay a lot of attention to Christians who fight the theory of Darwinian evolution on religious grounds. Of course, I pay even less attention to Darwinists who try to disprove God.

Also: God isn't everything. Where'd you pull that one from Smegma? I'm certainly not God.

Smegma · « **Reply #233 on:** March 17, 2009, 12:13:16 am »

Quote

Also: God isn't everything. Where'd you pull that one from Smegma? I'm certainly not God.

Not just you and just as well you are too.

N. Escalona · « **Reply #234 on:** March 17, 2009, 12:13:47 am »

Quote from: Smegma on March 17, 2009, 12:13:16 am

Quote
Also: God isn't everything. Where'd you pull that one from Smegma? I'm certainly not God.

Not just you and just as well you are too.

Complete sentence pls
with less awkward grammar

Smegma · « **Reply #235 on:** March 17, 2009, 12:16:38 am »

The "completeness" (for lack of a better word) is not something that can be described as a whole, part, or set, lest It be made lesser than its true worth. I'll do this anyway.

{LAW} Gamer_2k4 · « **Reply #236 on:** March 17, 2009, 08:16:21 am »

Quote from: N. Escalona on March 17, 2009, 12:11:59 am

Also: God isn't everything. Where'd you pull that one from Smegma? I'm certainly not God.

But what if "God" is some intelligent omnipotent "energy," for lack of a better word, that controls everything? What if the "free will" that is guiding your physical body is just a manifestation of that "God"? I know your religion calls for God to be a single being, and for everything else to be entities separate from him (as does mine), but that's not the only way to interpret God.

excruciator · « **Reply #237 on:** March 17, 2009, 08:31:47 am »

Quote from: Smegma on March 17, 2009, 12:16:38 am

The "completeness" (for lack of a better word) is not something that can be described as a whole, part, or set, lest It be made lesser than its true worth. I'll do this anyway.

I guess you can't use non-awkward sentences.

Quote from: {LAW} Gamer_2k4 on March 17, 2009, 08:16:21 am

Quote from: N. Escalona on March 17, 2009, 12:11:59 am
Also: God isn't everything. Where'd you pull that one from Smegma? I'm certainly not God.

But what if "God" is some intelligent omnipotent "energy," for lack of a better word, that controls everything? What if the "free will" that is guiding your physical body is just a manifestation of that "God"? I know your religion calls for God to be a single being, and for everything else to be entities separate from him (as does mine), but that's not the only way to interpret God.

It could, not it may not also.

Also, what do you religious folks think about Peter Popoff?
Is he the real deal? I mean miracle spring water is just miraculous. And the sacred bread baked in holy flame, can't get enough of that.

N. Escalona · « **Reply #238 on:** March 17, 2009, 11:58:43 am »

Quote from: {LAW} Gamer_2k4 on March 17, 2009, 08:16:21 am

Quote from: N. Escalona on March 17, 2009, 12:11:59 am
Also: God isn't everything. Where'd you pull that one from Smegma? I'm certainly not God.

But what if "God" is some intelligent omnipotent "energy," for lack of a better word, that controls everything? What if the "free will" that is guiding your physical body is just a manifestation of that "God"? I know your religion calls for God to be a single being, and for everything else to be entities separate from him (as does mine), but that's not the only way to interpret God.

We have free will, so that must be false. Also, that would mean that if the universe was destroyed, God would be too - another impossibility.
Yes, there are many different interpretations of God, but only one is correct. (Of course, others differ in how incorrect they are.)

@Peter Popoff - a charlatan.

Smegma · « **Reply #239 on:** March 17, 2009, 12:08:46 pm »

Quote from: excruciator on March 17, 2009, 08:31:47 am

Quote from: Smegma on March 17, 2009, 12:16:38 am
The "completeness" (for lack of a better word) is not something that can be described as a whole, part, or set, lest It be made lesser than its true worth. I'll do this anyway.

I guess you can't use non-awkward sentences.

I guess you can't understand why.

@N Escalona: (On a PS3 atm, so bear with me). This limits God in the sense that adhering a single definition limits anything. If this God is the true god, then I'd rather be aspiring to reach something different, greater (maybe not).

God can be both of the universe and beyond it.

News:

Author Topic: Official Religious Debate Thread (Read 81058 times)