0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
And oil: calling it a fossil foil is rather a false interpretation of its main origin, which would be the constant rotation of stuff under the Earth's crust. Essentially, we're set for many hundreds of years.
Quote from: excruciator on July 14, 2009, 06:17:49 pmIf that was the case then we wouldn't be having less trees than before.You're right, we wouldn't. And frankly, we don't.
If that was the case then we wouldn't be having less trees than before.
No, I don't think I am. Good job: "There are less trees in this 500 sq. mile radius, so I must be right!" Yea, uh-huh.
I was already probed by a group of aliens while out on a picnic... They went "Kinky Pleasures" movie on me. *cries*
I used to be quite gung-ho about the ozone layer and all that shizzy...
Quote from: jrgp on September 30, 2010, 03:36:50 pmOnly anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.so clearly jgrp is a goddamn anime connoisseur. his opinion might as well be law here.
Only anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.
Best Admin: jrgp, he's like the forum mom and a pet dog rolled into one.
I suppose I'm waiting for you to ask for my sources I used to be quite gung-ho about the ozone layer and all that shizzy...
As far as that goes, I was under the impression that the "holes" in the ozone over the poles exist because sunlight is required to change oxygen into ozone, and those places simply get less sunlight. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
...because sunlight is required to change oxygen into ozone, and those places simply get less sunlight.