ctf_Inte [2nd remake]

[Biggles]

Allright I'm not satisfied with this map so I decided too once again, remake it.
I'll probably make new version too.

I'll call it version 3
Changes:
- Made the lower route smaller and added 2 openings at the middle.
- Moved the flag + the polys it's stading on, closer to the spawns

EDIT:

- Removed the bars at top above the flags

[MetsuriTossavainen]

I have never played the original Inte but I'll give this a shot.

[DarkCrusade]

Well, Biggles, it seems like if you don´t have a layout going you simply remake one of your good maps. Best example: ctf_Rotten. Were it 2 or 3 remakes? I liked the old ctf_Inte a lot more than this remake. It was perfect in my opinion, even better than ctf_Ash (just my thought, don´t be me!)

Too bad you can´t write back.

[Biggles]

Another version is up once again

[DarkCrusade]

I could quote myself now but I won´t since my post is visable all around. Compared to the first version of this map things got worse, these root additions are complicating things a lot. The bridges won´t be used for anything but camping (top). The bottom route should be the safest but with those new bridges it gets more unsecure. Also I think that those pillars in the middle look pretty bad and you should change them. Please compare the flagbases pillars to each other. Those at the flag do have higher opacity than the lower ones what looks kind of out of place.

To come to a conclusion: 1st version was the best, I loved playing it. Don´t change Inte

[Biggles]

I think you'r wrong

[DarkCrusade]

Oh, why?

[Biggles]

another update, and no, the first version was not the best imo. Although it pains me I finally removed the bars at top. But the lower bridges will stay, I wont change anything before I get chance to try it in a 3v3,

[DarkCrusade]

another update, and no, the first version was not the best imo. Although it pains me I finally removed the bars at top. But the lower bridges will stay, I wont change anything before I get chance to try it in a 3v3,

Most of my suggestions were regarding to visuals anyway so don´t mind them until you are sure about the layout.

[Blacksheepboy]

And you once called me a perfectionist, if I recall correctly...

I suppose that is something we may have in common. I am still not satisfied (to the point of "I am 100% done") with a lot of my maps (but so far I am content to have it be that way).

[Biggles]

And you once called me a perfectionist, if I recall correctly...

Well I might be some kind of perfectionist in a way, so I understand you, though I only map when it's fun

[Horve]

Good job here, your map looks just like any other ordinary ctf map. You have no special mapping style, this map could have been made by any other jingbang from around here (of course not dominik, can't ever forget him). That's what all true warriors strive for, right? Oh wait...

[Blacksheepboy]

Good job here, your map looks just like any other ordinary ctf map. You have no special mapping style, this map could have been made by any other jingbang from around here (of course not dominik, can't ever forget him). That's what all true warriors strive for, right? Oh wait...

Huh, oddly enough, this reminds me of the question "Why do we, the mappers of today, map?"

[Boots]

ive played this map, I like it but one thing that was bothering me was spawn killing, and the spawn points.

[As de Espada]

I think the lower hill should be earlyer, so peopple can go up and down to/from the flag more flowy
I would change top polys, just a little bit (outsiders), from left to right

[Biggles]

I think the lower hill should be earlyer, so peopple can go up and down to/from the flag more flowy
I would change top polys, just a little bit (outsiders), from left to right

okay, ty for sugg, I'll do something when the time comes