0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm against this. What's the point of people/ animals all being the same? We were created to be different from others.
But as with all technologies, in the long run it will do more harm than good, Joe.Like mistaken identities in criminal cases.
Quote from: demoniac93 on May 18, 2010, 02:09:15 pmBut as with all technologies, in the long run it will do more harm than good, Joe.Like mistaken identities in criminal cases.Elaborate? I don't see medical technology as doing more harm than good. And as for mistaken identities, each clone probably has the the same DNA (maybe we can refer to it as a hash or checksum?) and thus any human body with that specific hash is one of "them" and not one of "us" (uncloned people).
developing certain emotions, shall we say, against their creators, and "rebel".
You create kids. They don't come flying in by Stork Airlines.
I don't create them, I do materialize a body, in a way, but I believe that the "soul" aka life comes from somewhere else.
Quote from: Centurion on May 18, 2010, 01:36:33 pmI'm against this. What's the point of people/ animals all being the same? We were created to be different from others.What about biologically engineering a "super soldier" and just cloning and using he/she/it for wars as opposed to drafting lots of naturally born people, many of which *will* die?
@bsb: There are different ways of cloning and one includes the foetus growing up in the mothers egg cell. Dolly had 3 mothers but no actual father for example.@demoniac: People could tell you things about religion that you wouldn't like to hear and I'm no christian either even if I was christened.
Organ backup is the only one that makes sense.I think giving away jobs to drones is a terrible idea. I don't think I have to explain why.If you don't understand, you're too young.
I think mass-cloning is a terrible idea, but in limited quantities, cloning may have merit. Cloning an animal to give maximum control over testing various drug effects would be an example. Cloning a single organ for a transplant - yes; growing a 'blank' human for organs - no; regardless of morality, maintaining a whole, vegetative Human for any purpose is just ridiculously inefficient.
Sorry didn't reply to your MSN Echo, was busy typing this reply.
If people wouldn't be led to kill with anything they invent
Since there will always be some really bad German scientist
QuoteIf people wouldn't be led to kill with anything they inventThat's a big 'if' lol..QuoteSince there will always be some really bad German scientistYes.. all german scientists are eeeeeeevil.. are you TRYING to troll at this point?
His point is that many inventions, although not initially intended for harm, end up being used that way if it has the potential. And there is always gonna be some s**thead state or country behind it.
Quote from: p0ppin on May 19, 2010, 10:13:13 amQuoteIf people wouldn't be led to kill with anything they inventThat's a big 'if' lol..QuoteSince there will always be some really bad German scientistYes.. all german scientists are eeeeeeevil.. are you TRYING to troll at this point?His point is that many inventions, although not initially intended for harm, end up being used that way if it has the potential. And there is always gonna be some s**thead state or country behind it.
That's the problem. But is there any possible solution to this problem that excludes war and stopping to trade with countries that are against it? In times in which people are trying to profit from everything you cannot argue with logical statements. It's not possible. You really need to threaten them and that makes me kind of sad..
Quote from: jrgp on September 30, 2010, 03:36:50 pmOnly anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.so clearly jgrp is a goddamn anime connoisseur. his opinion might as well be law here.
Only anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.
Best Admin: jrgp, he's like the forum mom and a pet dog rolled into one.
The idea of StarWars is to create an exact copy of the same person and that very often. The point is that it is combined with a growing accelerator or otherwise the whole thing wouldn't turn out to be that great as it is in the movie. In fact we are not able to invent such an accelerator.StarWars is just playing with the idea of a bigass army of clones that is not related to reality in any way so I don't even consider the possibility of a clone army.
Major, first of all the clone would only be the same in terms of the DNA. It would make its own experiences and would unlikely behave like the original. That's how it is.[/qoute]you sure is a dumbfuck. I said, IF it was a clone made by copying every particle in one instance, the clone would be an exact copy.why? (I'm sure you would ask that)because the clone has the originals memories, experiances and everything else.
You cannot get an exact clone by copying every molecule of the human body. It still would be a baby with the body of an adult and thus not very good as a soldier / your sexslave.