Poll

What do you think of destroying polys with LAW?

I support it..
5 (12.8%)
Ummm... okay.
6 (15.4%)
Ummm... rather no.
9 (23.1%)
No way!
19 (48.7%)

Total Members Voted: 39

Author Topic: M79LAW vs. Polys  (Read 4240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline realdeal

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 54
  • TEH HAXYEST HAX0RZ EVER TO HAX
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #20 on: August 11, 2006, 12:30:02 pm »
if it was similar to worms then yes
it it takes out polys and not little chunks then  no
ALL WEAPOONS TO USE THIS I SAY(except chainsaw and knife duh)

Edit: AL URE PGE 2 BELON 2 UZ
This is not a sig.

Offline Aquamenti

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 69
  • Avvy is done by ME, fool!
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #21 on: August 12, 2006, 02:55:54 am »
It would be similar to worms. Like this:



(look at the top right corner)
Damn noobs, this avvy is done by me!

Offline Mr. Domino

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 969
  • Don't just sit there and waste your precious time.
    • XBLIG.co
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2006, 04:36:49 am »
It would be similar to worms.

12 players x 4 grenades per player x infinite grenade respawns x cluster grenade bonuses x infinite LAW and M79 shots =

Offline Mistercharles

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1371
  • +
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #23 on: August 12, 2006, 07:40:18 am »
^Don't forget, all the scenery would still be there.
shoutout to m'boyz eagles_arrows, echo_trail, wraithlike, sadistatheart, chakapoko maker, jrgp, aznblood, chakra, keron cyst, et al, miss you, let's '#gather some day

Offline Aquamenti

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 69
  • Avvy is done by ME, fool!
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #24 on: August 13, 2006, 03:50:28 am »
^^And I said server owner can select invulnerable polys.
Damn noobs, this avvy is done by me!

Offline Toumaz

  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 1906
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #25 on: August 13, 2006, 11:14:40 am »
This idea and variations of it has been discussed before, and it is not possible. And:

Also, the map would have to be recomiled every time a poly is destroyed. No.

Offline Mr. Domino

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 969
  • Don't just sit there and waste your precious time.
    • XBLIG.co
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #26 on: August 13, 2006, 12:40:52 pm »
^Don't forget, all the scenery would still be there.

I know. Too time consuming to edit out stuff (which is why the menu stuff is gone, too). :)

^^And I said server owner can select invulnerable polys.

Maps aren't designed to be blown apart. This addition would require all existing maps to be redrawn, using thousands more polygons to achieve the effect in your image to get those kinds of small, smooth round craters on impact. That's just not going to happen.

Offline Bgretydews

  • Flagrunner
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
  • y halo thar rabbit
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #27 on: August 13, 2006, 02:43:34 pm »
Lawl, this is one of the worst ideas i have ever heard.
It would totally ruin soldat
http://yossi.jrgp.org/?action=maps&sa=user_maps&u=10
Image (and link) is broken. Feel free to fix it.

Offline Aquamenti

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 69
  • Avvy is done by ME, fool!
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #28 on: August 15, 2006, 04:39:54 am »
The recompiling thing sucks, yeah.
Damn noobs, this avvy is done by me!

Offline Kaine

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 97
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #29 on: August 16, 2006, 05:25:28 pm »
may work, will need MAJOR fine tunin before even being considered to be implemented.

Offline kilroy1501

  • Major(1)
  • Posts: 8
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #30 on: August 16, 2006, 05:31:14 pm »
destructable terrain would just be stupid in solat. at the end of big games thered be nothing left.

Offline boer

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 99
Re: M79LAW vs. Polys
« Reply #31 on: August 17, 2006, 02:48:00 pm »
Lawl, this is one of the worst ideas i have ever heard.
It would totally ruin soldat

All this meaningless rep's is sooo stupid because it doesnt really say anythin...just give an real reason such as " this amount of effort needed to implement this wont weigh up to what it gives in return..."
but thinking about it... how if there was sandbags/colliders that could be blown up, or crates(that is colliders also) that could move after an explotion rocked it?? i would look great. I think a 'more dynamic game enviroment' would be much fun.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2006, 02:51:17 pm by boer »