Third World War / New World Order

[Mexer]

oh wait...wrong bet?

[Mitak]

Americans created AIDS.

[SoldatFire]

Americans created AIDS.

yes

[jettlarue]

Awesome video of arresting judge in englandhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxEN1FDteaE&feature=player_embedded#at=586
And GE paying $0 in corporate taxeshttp://theweek.com/article/index/213590/why-doesnt-general-electric-pay-taxes

Seems like its time we remove the judges and people that allow this kind of shit to happen, it doesn't just all coincidently come together. These people know full well they are allowing the destruction of our country for a few bucks. Sounds to me like a way worse way of stealing then just taking it the old fashioned way (tax).

[smiluu]

oh wait...wrong bet?

Dont worry, spanky. You still have me!

[demoniac93]

demoniac: Yes a president could be seen as a representative for a large part of the population, but whether individuals are representing ideologies doesn't have anything to do with this. A population is different from an ideology.

But so what? What in Obama reminds you of European settlers? What in Merkel reminds you of Nazism?

Obama reminds me of Africans bought for pennies.
Merkel's got way too many facial features in common with Adolf.
But that's not the point, how can a president NOT represent an ideology when the majority pf the population voted for him because he represents their IDEAS.

[DarkCrusade]

A president only represents the different lobbies - where the money is. It's just how it is.

Money, money, money, MONEY

[demoniac93]

A president only represents the different lobbies - where the money is. It's just how it is.

Money, money, money, MONEY

Nah, he doesn't win the elections by paying people, but by bullshitting the population. Bullshit is usually affiliated with "opinion" in my books. Opinions form ideologies.

[12th_account]

demoniac: Yes a president could be seen as a representative for a large part of the population, but whether individuals are representing ideologies doesn't have anything to do with this. A population is different from an ideology.

But so what? What in Obama reminds you of European settlers? What in Merkel reminds you of Nazism?

Obama reminds me of Africans bought for pennies.
Merkel's got way too many facial features in common with Adolf.
But that's not the point, how can a president NOT represent an ideology when the majority pf the population voted for him because he represents their IDEAS.

So you dismiss an entire country and its population because their president looks like someone from its past? That's pretty shallow of you.

And what does it matter if a president represents an ideology? I never claimed that they didn't. So far it just doesn't relate to the discussion.

[demoniac93]

demoniac: Yes a president could be seen as a representative for a large part of the population, but whether individuals are representing ideologies doesn't have anything to do with this. A population is different from an ideology.

But so what? What in Obama reminds you of European settlers? What in Merkel reminds you of Nazism?

Obama reminds me of Africans bought for pennies.
Merkel's got way too many facial features in common with Adolf.
But that's not the point, how can a president NOT represent an ideology when the majority pf the population voted for him because he represents their IDEAS.

So you dismiss an entire country and its population because their president looks like someone from its past? That's pretty shallow of you.

And what does it matter if a president represents an ideology? I never claimed that they didn't. So far it just doesn't relate to the discussion.

I said, that's not the point. READ.

Actually, it does. Have you been trying to constantly read all previous posts before answering? Or do you lack the attention spam for that?
Debates are a build up of different points being put across in a discussion. So start trackign back...

[12th_account]

You dismissing a country was the reason for the discussion in the first place. You can't suddenly claim that that's not the point.

And if you want to discuss whether a president represents an ideology then you're gonna have to convince me why that matters.

And please refrain from the personal attacks.

[demoniac93]

You dismissing a country was the reason for the discussion in the first place. You can't suddenly claim that that's not the point.

And if you want to discuss whether a president represents an ideology then you're gonna have to convince me why that matters.

And please refrain from the personal attacks.

Well, to enlighten you as to why I "dismiss" a country, you've just proven that at the very least 80% of the American population, are simply stupid.
All this time, I was telling you about the president being the one man representing the people's ideas, and not one time since I brought it up, did you even think about mentioning the congress, proving me wrong.
You forgot that it's not even the president who makes half the decisions, but the congress.

...

[Mittsu]

demoniac you're f**king retarded

and making big statements doesn't hide it

stop pretending you know anything about debating, because you lack basic logical thinking

[DarkCrusade]

Anyone noticed how any thread discussing anything related to the USA which could be put in a negative way turns into a shit- and flamewar? You guys always get personal.

[Mittsu]

it has nothing to do with USA, it does have a lot to do with stupidity. I was watching demoniac for several pages and i couldnt hold myself anymore

[demoniac93]

it has nothing to do with USA, it does have a lot to do with stupidity. I was watching demoniac for several pages and i couldnt hold myself anymore

Hey, this isn't a goddamn birth control lecture, so you don't need to hold anything, if you don't like me, say it, I couldn't give less a shit about it either way.
And no, I don't argue with people because I know that nobody can be convinced about anything with words.
I just watch people "debate" me to see how fucked up some of them really are.
You obviously would get an A+ for the effort alone.

[12th_account]

You dismissing a country was the reason for the discussion in the first place. You can't suddenly claim that that's not the point.

And if you want to discuss whether a president represents an ideology then you're gonna have to convince me why that matters.

And please refrain from the personal attacks.

Well, to enlighten you as to why I "dismiss" a country, you've just proven that at the very least 80% of the American population, are simply stupid.
All this time, I was telling you about the president being the one man representing the people's ideas, and not one time since I brought it up, did you even think about mentioning the congress, proving me wrong.
You forgot that it's not even the president who makes half the decisions, but the congress.

...

You're gonna have to add a reasoning why you think at least 80% of the population are stupid. And what does it have to do with the USA's origin?

And I never claimed that the president makes all the decision in the USA.

[Espadon]

I just watch people "debate" me to see how f**ked up some of them really are.

I'm sure Foxconn approves of this excuse.

[smiluu]

Call out Mexer for his piece of advice, he will come up with a rational solution to your problems using his maximum wits.

[demoniac93]

I just watch people "debate" me to see how f**ked up some of them really are.

I'm sure Foxconn approves of this excuse.

What's an excuse?