0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
You guys might be forgetting one thing here. Unless you all play 1v1 servers, this is mainly a team game, unless your playing DM...Its just the thing that pisses me off is the fact that 3/4ths of a team pick either the M79 and Barret, so even if you dodge the 1st one with some unique, awsome looking and perfectly exicuted play, its not like that barreter behind him, the Styger in front of him, and the Guy with the other M79 are going to miss
I hope M79 and Barret users take a look at this, stop being so selfish by at least giving their opponents a chance of killing them to make soldat more enjoyable to play for everyone. i hope you all consider how fun this game is for the people you play with, and not just how fun it is to yourself. You can do this by simply varying your weapon choices, theres already 14 to pick from!
Do you read what you type before you press 'Post'? You're implying that I... ...don't make us change our M79 and Barret.
Not reading any of these posts, my opinion is that those two guns are very unfair.The Barret is a long range gun. Its not meant to be used 8 meters away. It's too cheap. My solution is that the Barret should be very inaccurate, or better yet, held straight up until you either crouch or go prone. Then your soldier can hold the gun in the firing position and take out your target. You know that the Barret in real life is a .50 caliber gun and would probably knock you down if you stood upright!
The M79 is a weapon that deals death. Combine that with a mid-speed reload time and you're way too deadly with it. Even though I tend to be able to get around those who weild this gun (travel in pairs: i rarely see m79's pick off two with one shot), it is still cheap beyond reason. My solution is that the M79 should fire an incinerary round with a wider blast radius. I think that more fire and less death will balance it out and add a little flare to the fight (couldn't help myself).
I'm a pro with the FN Minimi and am proud with it. It pisses me off that usually, when i walk into a deathmatch, i see nothing but M79's or Barrets filling up the right side of my screen. I consider these two guns to be dishonorable for the user now, and dont have any respect for that player, even though I get a 3:1 Kill/Death ratio anyway and usually win.
Come on people! Use a gun that lets you proudly say "I killed you with a gun that isn't cheap!"
Quote from: jrgp on September 30, 2010, 03:36:50 pmOnly anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.so clearly jgrp is a goddamn anime connoisseur. his opinion might as well be law here.
Only anime shows I've felt any interest in over the years are Pokemon (original TV series) and various hentai.
Best Admin: jrgp, he's like the forum mom and a pet dog rolled into one.
Not reading any of these posts, my opinion is that those two guns are very unfair.
Quote from: Protoman on January 17, 2007, 11:14:24 pmNot reading any of these posts, my opinion is that those two guns are very unfair.This right here sums up the average m79 whiner. Uninformed, unskilled, unexperenced yet wants to comment on how they are right and you are wrong.Bravo.
Quote from: ZWZ on January 19, 2007, 02:57:19 amQuote from: Protoman on January 17, 2007, 11:14:24 pmNot reading any of these posts, my opinion is that those two guns are very unfair.This right here sums up the average m79 whiner. Uninformed, unskilled, unexperienced yet wants to comment on how they are right and you are wrong.Bravo.So you are saying that you have to be an M79 supporter to be informed, skilled and experienced?
Quote from: Protoman on January 17, 2007, 11:14:24 pmNot reading any of these posts, my opinion is that those two guns are very unfair.This right here sums up the average m79 whiner. Uninformed, unskilled, unexperienced yet wants to comment on how they are right and you are wrong.Bravo.
I think the main reason people whine about the M79/Barrett is because weather you survive mostly depends on how skilled the M79/Barretter is at hitting you first time, so the only way you can survive is binking them and/or praying they miss. With non-one-hit-kill weapons, you both have a chance of killing each other at the same time (although map situations like range effects that) and the person who can keep the best aim over the shooting period wins. But with the M79/Barrett, it's all over in a flash, which makes people pretty pissed off, especially if it was a cheap shot.Although there is such thing as a skilled Barret shot, sometimes it just doesn't feel like cricket.Quote from: ZWZ on January 19, 2007, 02:57:19 amQuote from: Protoman on January 17, 2007, 11:14:24 pmNot reading any of these posts, my opinion is that those two guns are very unfair.This right here sums up the average m79 whiner. Uninformed, unskilled, unexperenced yet wants to comment on how they are right and you are wrong.Bravo.So you are saying that you have to be an M79 supporter to be informed, skilled and experienced?
People who really know the m79 know that it is far from the best gun in the game.
If your whole gameplan is hoping the m79er misses, then you really got to think up new strategy's.
"Hopeing that they miss" sounds like a whiner, who thinks that the only defence againsed it is just a poor user. Not true.If you are informed, skilled, experenced, and generally not **** at the game, you wouldent be a whiner. I don't like people who play defensivly with the aug/ak/ruger. I know that it has it's advantages, as well as it's disadvantages. That doesnt mean i have to come here crying on how they should change the guns that i lose to.If you are good enough at soldat, you'll come to the point you hope the majority of the oppisite team uses m79's, so you can have a very easy time getting away with the flag. Majority of players out there are horrible with it anyway, i don't see why every 5 minuites some Major has to come in and complain about it.
i think this thread goes around in circles...