0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
you know what let's give a socom a delay too, so no more people posting "overpowered" socom.....let's put a delay on shotgun!!!! oh the ****ness in the world.
m79 is for close-range combat. You want to give a close-range weapon a delay?"ZOMFG, an enemy is right behind me!"*click*"WTF, M79 has a delay?!"**Killed by Footshlonger**
Quote from: Xxypher on June 30, 2007, 04:12:24 pmYour acting like your having a duel and your opponent gets a pistol and you get a spork.Isn't that pretty much what it is? I dunno wtf a spork is, I suppose it's way weaker than the pistol since you compared that to this.
Your acting like your having a duel and your opponent gets a pistol and you get a spork.
M79 definately needs a StartUpTime. So people can react before they're blown to pieces.
Quote from: Yuth on June 15, 2006, 03:14:36 pmM79 definately needs a StartUpTime. So people can react before they're blown to pieces. Remember that there is no player with 100% accuracy, and keep in mind that yo can always press X when u see m79, to dodge.
Delay!!! Pleeasssee put delay! M79 is currently just a weapon for noobs and newbs. If you don't put delay then make it take two hits to kill and faster reload time. That would be good.
As such, I believe a delayed fire would be appropriate: it would effectively discourage use of the gun as such a high-speed assault weapon, and do it without hindering the weapon's intended purpose.
... Delay wouldn't solve anything; the barret is just as effective with its delay. ...
omg jesus christ, the only thing m79 can do well is close range combat, but if you put a delay on it, you're taking away all it has left...
If m79 had a delay, people who want the quickest 1 hit kill weapon wouldn't know where to turn.
I should have elaborated more on my reasoning, though; the idea of a delay is not to prevent the weapon from being used in such a way entirely--I do agree that a player experienced with the weapon could still use it in such a fashion--but the intention is to prevent novice players from latching on to it without at least seriously trying the other weapons.
Is it only me or the poll is abushed? almost everyone agreed here there's no need for delay but in the poll it's 25 against 15? M79 shouldn't have delay anyhow and if u did realy abush the scores u should delete it right away (and if u did it's realy lame.)
I suggested long ago on the old forums to make the weapons limited by registration. Lockout the last four weapons on the primary list unless you have a reg key.
It's fine, just way way way overused
Look who's talkin' 'bout ignoring polls now when it's conveniently about his favo
Or that it does more damage to the user when they use it and blasts somebody when their only 2 feet infront of them lol.
people just hate m79 cause it's one shot kill...it's not that overpowered i think. maybe overused.but if there's anything people hate more then one shot kill weapons is weapons with delay. is just not fun. just make it slower or less powerfull.another gun with delay would really make the game crappier.
Quote from: Bongobong on July 01, 2006, 05:15:10 ampeople just hate m79 cause it's one shot kill...it's not that overpowered i think. maybe overused.but if there's anything people hate more then one shot kill weapons is weapons with delay. is just not fun. just make it slower or less powerfull.another gun with delay would really make the game crappier.That's not true. barret used to be instant shoot one hit kill weapon and it got a delay to it. Those that are good with it aren't bothered too much by that delay since the real need for skill still exists. If m79 would get a delay only the real pros could still use it effectively. It will also lower the number of noobs using it!
There is no likelyhood. I'd rather bankrupt The Coca Cola Company than put delay on M79... well no.
I'm euro so I have no clue what root beer is :E
its either delay both or un-delay barrett.