0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Xxypher on June 30, 2007, 04:12:24 pmYour acting like your having a duel and your opponent gets a pistol and you get a spork.Isn't that pretty much what it is? I dunno wtf a spork is, I suppose it's way weaker than the pistol since you compared that to this.
Your acting like your having a duel and your opponent gets a pistol and you get a spork.
How about that the shield has a sertain amouth of "armor" wich will be seen in the ammo bar, as the sheild takes damage, the bar will go down and eventually itll break when it reaches zero....
Quote from: Zegovia on June 18, 2006, 10:51:03 amHow about that the shield has a sertain amouth of "armor" wich will be seen in the ammo bar, as the sheild takes damage, the bar will go down and eventually itll break when it reaches zero....yeah cos imagine how annoying it would be if youd just blasted someones shield but they managed to avoid the rest of your wrath until they'd 'reloaded' it then come back again.
in real lfe chainsaws dont reload, so igeuss it wouldnt be wierd to have a reloading shield. I actually like this idea...it would add a whole new strategy to the game, and it would be a whole new skill to develop!
Quote from: T-Bone on June 18, 2006, 09:03:10 amin real lfe chainsaws dont reload, so igeuss it wouldnt be wierd to have a reloading shield. I actually like this idea...it would add a whole new strategy to the game, and it would be a whole new skill to develop!Here's an idea -- make the chainsaw the "shield." Make the actual saw part of the chainsaw deflect shots when being used. This will make the saw more useable both as an offensive and defensive weapon. Since it'd be running from the existing weapon, there wouldn't be an issues with removing/adding weapons, and it shouldn't be much to get a running chainsaw invincible, deadly land type properties.
The problem with that idea, though, is that it encourages players to use M79s, barrets, and autos
I AM A SMARTARSED PRICK OF A HUMAN BEINGI AM ALSO DOUCHEBAGGERY, AND I'M SPREADING
It would be abused, so no.
Quote from: jrgp on June 20, 2006, 03:18:03 pmIt would be abused, so no.Could you be a little more specific?