Polygon type: Only FLAGS collides

[smiluu]

Unattended flags collide, they stop colliding when being holded.
I mean.. I didn't mean this.

I think it would be pretty good actually. Since there's going to be flaggers collide, flaggers hurts and so on
this wouldn't hurt much either. (I think there should be one like flaggers tear f**king apart too)

-Would allow floating flag positions
-Would be usefull if you wan't to prevent flags falling/flying off
-And stuff

[-Major-]

I would rather have "only flagger can pass" polygons.

[L[0ne]R]

The picture's hilarious, I'd F12 to that idea.

Seriously though - I agree with your suggestion, but I think the way polytypes work now is inefficient in the first place.
Instead of having lots of polytypes with hard-coded properties - it would be nicer to have just one polytype and the ability to select what you want it to collide with.

[smiluu]

It would be nicer to have just one polytype and the ability to select what you want it to collide with.

I gave it same thoughts when I was looking at the "team-collide polygons" list in polyworks. Hell, its a mess when you try to focus on
selecting the right one. Like you said, these new polygon types should be shortened to "Team collides", "Team flaggers Collides"
and "Flag whatevers" with their various options. Fuck with that, lets have one for "Collide" too. Since it's common thing to mess up with those too.

[DarkCrusade]

I think this is a great idea. F12´d.

[ValiS]

The picture made my day! thanks. Good idea BTW

[nEttsE]

F12 since this guy has nice suggestions. Also, if this would work, it would be perfect. Btw, your pic made me laugh -> and if this would be possible, then another F12. Cause running forcing your flag to slide, yay. Flag -> ELASTOMANIA.

[-Major-]

he meant NOT like the pic..

[DarkCrusade]

It´s always to see someone fail so hard

[Centurion]

No, I f11 this.

[DarkCrusade]

No, I f11 this.

Then state your opinion, give us an argument against it so we can discuss.

[Neosano]

F12

and... Hilarious picture

[SyavX]

F12 since this guy has nice suggestions. Also, if this would work, it would be perfect. Btw, your pic made me laugh -> and if this would be possible, then another F12. Cause running forcing your flag to slide, yay. Flag -> ELASTOMANIA.

hehe, i got same feeling about Soldat + Elma

Soldat

 +
ElastoMania

=
this

[L[0ne]R]

I think people are getting confused what here is a joke and what's the actual suggestion.  :S

[DarkCrusade]

@Loner:

F12 since this guy has nice suggestions. Also, if this would work, it would be perfect. Btw, your pic made me laugh -> and if this would be possible, then another F12. Cause running forcing your flag to slide, yay. Flag -> ELASTOMANIA.

Like this?

[demoniac93]

So do I.
This would at least add reasonable variety to maps.

[Fryer]

Yeah, I also think how the polygon types work now (one byte in the file format) is way too crappy.
I'm planning on changing many parts of the map format for whatever comes after 1.5.1, so when i do that, poly types like this one will be very possible.

@pic: Haha, lol!

[Dusty]

Making all polies 'neutral' at first and having a list of types would be awesome.

Code: [Select]

[ ] players collide
 [ ] team x collide
[ ] bullets collide
 [ ] team x's bullets collide
[ ] deadly
[ ] hurts
[ ] ice
[ ] bouncy...etc... One could pick multiple types, you get the point.

(a bit off the subject)

[Monsteri]

HAR HAR HARRR HAA HAA.




yes.