Soldat now and tomorrow

[scarface09]

amen.

[Jazza]

Shut the fuck up asshat. You arnt included in the community.

[Corporal Dunn]

Oh look whos saying that! Hahahahaha!

[scarface09]

Shush...your from broadmeadows LOL. Enough said mate.

[demoniac93]

I don't know the guy who wrote that, but I see lots of truth there.

[PQ]

Let me give the new devs a good advice. It took MM 7 years to figure out.

it’s amazing how much you can accomplish if you just sit and code

[Meteorisch]

I lolled so much about Jazzas post hahahaahhaa

[Madow]

Shut the f**k up asshat. You arnt included in the community.

This.

I'm glad I don't see you around the Aus pub servers, Clownman.. unless you're aliasing again.

[Corporal Dunn]

I am very impressed how quickly normal threads turn into flamewars. ;]

[Wes]

yup, open source or a very well selected team that will work well together.

[Furai]

Still no valid response from MM. This is getting really annoying...I wonder if he talked with anyone interested in developing soldat...

[FliesLikeABrick]

OK I'm glad we had this talk .

I'm currently biased with what FliesLikeABrick wrote:

I would choose something like this - not open sourcing it but not being super-selective on who can work on it.  There are a number of people in the community who are very capable developers.  I would say that community members who are known for being strong developers and trustworthy be given subversion access as long as they work together to accomplish the same goals.  That way then can then commit together.

We can try that and later on depending on the results decide to open-source it or not. I'll have a word with people interested in being a dev and let you know what's next.

he's working on it ... give him more than two days.  I'm sure you know how hard it is to get in touch with people all over the world within one or two days.

[Furai]

OK I'm glad we had this talk .

I'm currently biased with what FliesLikeABrick wrote:

I would choose something like this - not open sourcing it but not being super-selective on who can work on it.  There are a number of people in the community who are very capable developers.  I would say that community members who are known for being strong developers and trustworthy be given subversion access as long as they work together to accomplish the same goals.  That way then can then commit together.

We can try that and later on depending on the results decide to open-source it or not. I'll have a word with people interested in being a dev and let you know what's next.

he's working on it ... give him more than two days.  I'm sure you know how hard it is to get in touch with people all over the world within one or two days.

Two days? Wait a second...6 November - 1 November gives woot?? 5 days... Pretty much everyone interested in developing soldat idle constantly at #soldat.devs or visit this forums everyday just to check on news - so I'm sure that they can read and response to whatever PM Michal would have sent them either on forums or over IRC...

[Leo]

Everything about Soldat happens in "Bullet Time" speed 

[Monsteri]

Lol that's right.  ``bullet speed´´

[Meteorisch]

get some action going on turtles

even my boss wouldn't accept this speed

[L[0ne]R]

OK I'm glad we had this talk .

I'm currently biased with what FliesLikeABrick wrote:

I would choose something like this - not open sourcing it but not being super-selective on who can work on it.  There are a number of people in the community who are very capable developers.  I would say that community members who are known for being strong developers and trustworthy be given subversion access as long as they work together to accomplish the same goals.  That way then can then commit together.

We can try that and later on depending on the results decide to open-source it or not. I'll have a word with people interested in being a dev and let you know what's next.

he's working on it ... give him more than two days.  I'm sure you know how hard it is to get in touch with people all over the world within one or two days.

As much as I'd love to know the final decision about Soldat's future, I do agree that MM could use more time. This decision is not something to be rushed with. Of course I'm not saying we should wait another half a year for his response, but 5 days is too soon. I'd say 2 weeks should be enough (cmon, what's 2 weeks compared to almost 2 years we've been waiting for 1.5.1?)

[Mittsu]

1.5.1 could be released by now regardless though

[Meteorisch]

OK I'm glad we had this talk .

I'm currently biased with what FliesLikeABrick wrote:

I would choose something like this - not open sourcing it but not being super-selective on who can work on it.  There are a number of people in the community who are very capable developers.  I would say that community members who are known for being strong developers and trustworthy be given subversion access as long as they work together to accomplish the same goals.  That way then can then commit together.

We can try that and later on depending on the results decide to open-source it or not. I'll have a word with people interested in being a dev and let you know what's next.

he's working on it ... give him more than two days.  I'm sure you know how hard it is to get in touch with people all over the world within one or two days.

As much as I'd love to know the final decision about Soldat's future, I do agree that MM could use more time. This decision is not something to be rushed with. Of course I'm not saying we should wait another half a year for his response, but 5 days is too soon. I'd say 2 weeks should be enough (cmon, what's 2 weeks compared to almost 2 years we've been waiting for 1.5.1?)

I think 2 days is even too long.

Look how patiently we waited for a new version, and received nothing but some crappy details.
MM should know his soldat players have waited long enough and should do this asap.

Its his responsibility now anyway. so hurry the f*ck up. Being nice ain't working anymore seriously.

[DarkCrusade]

That's bullshit, Meteorisch. Noone is entitled to tell MM anything. It's his game and he may do with it what he wants to do, and if he needs time thinking, it's none of your business to make him come to a conclusion. End of the story.