0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: homerofgods on October 20, 2011, 02:53:24 pmIn the 1.6 versions, Alpha is allways on top of the list and Bravo allways on bottom due to the separation of the teams, I think this only make it harder to understand.I would suggest removing Alpha, Bravo, total kills/deaths and those ugly ass lines alltogether, and let all players be ranked in the same list.this is what i want, also what poll says
In the 1.6 versions, Alpha is allways on top of the list and Bravo allways on bottom due to the separation of the teams, I think this only make it harder to understand.I would suggest removing Alpha, Bravo, total kills/deaths and those ugly ass lines alltogether, and let all players be ranked in the same list.
Quote from: Bistoufly on October 20, 2011, 07:19:14 pmI prefer sorted by caps. That way it doesn't turn into deathmatch. And it doesn't encourage people to use tactics like camping, blocking, spawkilling.Demos please, I've never seen a CTF game turn into a TDM (except in R/S). :/ People who want deathmatch usually play deathmatch, not capture the flag.
I prefer sorted by caps. That way it doesn't turn into deathmatch. And it doesn't encourage people to use tactics like camping, blocking, spawkilling.
What about the statwhores , the large number of players that only play for kills. I know lots of players like this that wouldn't cap anything, only kill like in team deathmatch and spawnkill like hell.
When the 1.5 scorboard was on, everyone I knew was fighting and bragging about kills, not caps.
<evhO> I think qb is trying to kill soldat
What about the statwh**es , the large number of players that only play for kills. I know lots of players like this that wouldn't cap anything, only kill like in team deathmatch and spawnkill like hell. And talking about that, tbh the new scoreboard really encouraged me to be more of a team player and contribute as much as I can so we/I can score. When the 1.5 scorboard was on, everyone I knew was fighting and bragging about kills, not caps.
Isn't it better to have a non-teambased scoreboard? To find the 'best' player in a in a clanwar you'd have to first look at the top red player, then the top blue player, then compare them to eachother before the endscreen dissapears. I would rather just look at the top player on the list!
.------------------------------. | Scoreboard | +----+-----------------+-------+ | Alpha | Bravo | +----+-----------------+-------+ | Player1 | Player1 | | Player2 | Player2 | | Player3 | Player3 | +----+-----------------+-------+ '-----+-----------------+-------'
If I ever made a game with a gamemode named capture the cat, I would obviously make a scoreboard that puts the players that scored the cat as much on the top , because that's the f***ng purpose of the gamemode, and the 2nd criteria will be the number of kills . Someone who will want to be on top gonna be that someone who does what he should do in this gamemode, and that's capture the cat. Even if you kill you scoring, killing still isn't the point of the capture the cat mode.
And I doubt any of them would brag about killing just one single person even if he was important. It wasn't the goal itself - it was the path to that goal that was the most challenging.
its been said few times already that enabling this wont bring back old scoreboard sorting.